Immigrants from Scotland vs Cambodian Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 193,899,668 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Scotland and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.461 and weighted average of 14.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 102,087,576 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Cambodians and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.257 and weighted average of 14.4%, a difference of 2.7%.

Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary

Measurement	Immigrants from Scotland	Cambodian
Minimum	2.7%	5.5%
Maximum	72.0%	28.9%
Range	69.3%	23.4%
Mean	18.2%	13.9%
Median	13.3%	12.2%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	11.3%	9.5%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	22.1%	18.4%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	10.7%	8.8%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	14.2%	5.9%
Standard Deviation (Population)	14.0%	5.8%

Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Scotland and Cambodians by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16

In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Scotland are Korean (14.1%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants from Bolivia (14.0%, a difference of 0.16%), Immigrants from Asia (14.1%, a difference of 0.29%), Immigrants from Greece (14.1%, a difference of 0.79%), and Croatian (14.1%, a difference of 0.82%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Cambodians are Polish (14.4%, a difference of 0.0%), Zimbabwean (14.4%, a difference of 0.20%), Immigrants from Bulgaria (14.4%, a difference of 0.26%), Immigrants from Serbia (14.4%, a difference of 0.34%), and Immigrants from Indonesia (14.4%, a difference of 0.39%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Immigrants \| Bolivia	99.5 /100 \| #41	Exceptional 14.0%
Immigrants \| Scotland	99.4 /100 \| #42	Exceptional 14.0%
Koreans	99.4 /100 \| #43	Exceptional 14.1%
Immigrants \| Asia	99.4 /100 \| #44	Exceptional 14.1%
Immigrants \| Greece	99.3 /100 \| #45	Exceptional 14.1%
Croatians	99.3 /100 \| #46	Exceptional 14.1%
Immigrants \| Czechoslovakia	99.3 /100 \| #47	Exceptional 14.2%
Czechs	99.3 /100 \| #48	Exceptional 14.2%
Greeks	99.2 /100 \| #49	Exceptional 14.2%
Immigrants \| Israel	99.2 /100 \| #50	Exceptional 14.2%
Immigrants \| Pakistan	99.1 /100 \| #51	Exceptional 14.2%
Italians	99.1 /100 \| #52	Exceptional 14.3%
Luxembourgers	99.0 /100 \| #53	Exceptional 14.3%
Estonians	98.9 /100 \| #54	Exceptional 14.3%
Immigrants \| Romania	98.9 /100 \| #55	Exceptional 14.3%
Immigrants \| Indonesia	98.9 /100 \| #56	Exceptional 14.4%
Immigrants \| Serbia	98.9 /100 \| #57	Exceptional 14.4%
Immigrants \| Bulgaria	98.8 /100 \| #58	Exceptional 14.4%
Zimbabweans	98.8 /100 \| #59	Exceptional 14.4%
Poles	98.7 /100 \| #60	Exceptional 14.4%
Cambodians	98.7 /100 \| #61	Exceptional 14.4%