Lumbee vs Luxembourger Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
COMPARE
Lumbee
Luxembourger
Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 Comparison
Lumbee
Luxembourgers
31.9%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG BOYS UNDER 16
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
346th/ 347
METRIC RANK
13.8%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG BOYS UNDER 16
99.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
36th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Lumbee vs Luxembourger Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 91,775,991 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Lumbee and poverty level among boys under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.111 and weighted average of 31.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 143,279,235 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Luxembourgers and poverty level among boys under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.526 and weighted average of 13.8%, a difference of 131.1%.
Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Lumbee | Luxembourger |
Minimum | 5.4% | 1.3% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 50.0% |
Range | 94.6% | 48.7% |
Mean | 42.9% | 11.9% |
Median | 42.9% | 10.7% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 28.2% | 5.8% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 50.7% | 14.7% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 22.4% | 8.9% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 19.5% | 9.4% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 19.3% | 9.3% |
Similar Demographics by Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
Demographics Similar to Lumbee by Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
In terms of child poverty among boys under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Lumbee are Tohono O'odham (31.6%, a difference of 1.1%), Puerto Rican (32.8%, a difference of 2.9%), Yuman (30.6%, a difference of 4.2%), Navajo (30.3%, a difference of 5.4%), and Pima (29.7%, a difference of 7.3%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 |
Apache | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 24.5% |
Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 24.5% |
Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 24.7% |
Sioux | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 25.3% |
Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 25.8% |
Hopi | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 25.9% |
Houma | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 26.2% |
Crow | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 26.3% |
Immigrants | Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 28.9% |
Pima | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 29.7% |
Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 30.3% |
Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 30.6% |
Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 31.6% |
Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 31.9% |
Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #347 | Tragic 32.8% |
Demographics Similar to Luxembourgers by Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
In terms of child poverty among boys under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Luxembourgers are Russian (13.8%, a difference of 0.27%), Immigrants from Sri Lanka (13.9%, a difference of 0.41%), Immigrants from Northern Europe (13.9%, a difference of 0.56%), Immigrants from Australia (13.9%, a difference of 0.70%), and Immigrants from Asia (13.9%, a difference of 0.94%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 |
Cypriots | 99.8 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 13.6% |
Swedes | 99.8 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 13.6% |
Turks | 99.8 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 13.6% |
Immigrants | China | 99.8 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 13.6% |
Danes | 99.8 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 13.6% |
Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 99.8 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 13.6% |
Russians | 99.7 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 13.8% |
Luxembourgers | 99.7 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 13.8% |
Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 99.6 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 13.9% |
Immigrants | Northern Europe | 99.6 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 13.9% |
Immigrants | Australia | 99.6 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 13.9% |
Immigrants | Asia | 99.6 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 13.9% |
Lithuanians | 99.6 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 14.0% |
Koreans | 99.6 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 14.0% |
Croatians | 99.5 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 14.0% |