Burmese vs Choctaw Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
COMPARE
Burmese
Choctaw
Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 Comparison
Burmese
Choctaw
13.0%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG BOYS UNDER 16
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
12th/ 347
METRIC RANK
21.3%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG BOYS UNDER 16
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
307th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Burmese vs Choctaw Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 454,977,536 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Burmese and poverty level among boys under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.297 and weighted average of 13.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 267,402,535 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Choctaw and poverty level among boys under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.531 and weighted average of 21.3%, a difference of 64.5%.
Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Burmese | Choctaw |
Minimum | 1.2% | 6.7% |
Maximum | 41.5% | 100.0% |
Range | 40.3% | 93.3% |
Mean | 10.9% | 33.8% |
Median | 9.0% | 27.9% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.6% | 22.9% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 13.7% | 35.5% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 8.1% | 12.6% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 7.7% | 18.4% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 7.6% | 18.2% |
Similar Demographics by Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
Demographics Similar to Burmese by Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
In terms of child poverty among boys under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Burmese are Immigrants from Korea (13.0%, a difference of 0.50%), Immigrants from Ireland (13.1%, a difference of 1.2%), Immigrants from Japan (13.1%, a difference of 1.3%), Maltese (13.2%, a difference of 1.6%), and Norwegian (13.2%, a difference of 1.7%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 |
Chinese | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 11.9% |
Immigrants | Hong Kong | 100.0 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 12.3% |
Iranians | 100.0 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 12.4% |
Immigrants | Singapore | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 12.5% |
Immigrants | Iran | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 12.5% |
Bhutanese | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 12.6% |
Immigrants | South Central Asia | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 12.7% |
Burmese | 99.9 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 13.0% |
Immigrants | Korea | 99.9 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 13.0% |
Immigrants | Ireland | 99.9 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 13.1% |
Immigrants | Japan | 99.9 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 13.1% |
Maltese | 99.9 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 13.2% |
Norwegians | 99.9 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 13.2% |
Bulgarians | 99.9 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 13.3% |
Bolivians | 99.9 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 13.3% |
Demographics Similar to Choctaw by Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
In terms of child poverty among boys under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Choctaw are Immigrants from Grenada (21.3%, a difference of 0.090%), Kiowa (21.3%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Central America (21.3%, a difference of 0.27%), Immigrants from Haiti (21.3%, a difference of 0.33%), and Immigrants from Mexico (21.5%, a difference of 0.71%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 |
Haitians | 0.0 /100 | #300 | Tragic 21.0% |
Guatemalans | 0.0 /100 | #301 | Tragic 21.1% |
Somalis | 0.0 /100 | #302 | Tragic 21.1% |
Immigrants | Haiti | 0.0 /100 | #303 | Tragic 21.3% |
Immigrants | Central America | 0.0 /100 | #304 | Tragic 21.3% |
Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #305 | Tragic 21.3% |
Immigrants | Grenada | 0.0 /100 | #306 | Tragic 21.3% |
Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #307 | Tragic 21.3% |
Immigrants | Mexico | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 21.5% |
Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 21.5% |
Creek | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 21.5% |
Bahamians | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 21.6% |
Immigrants | Guatemala | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 21.6% |
British West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 21.6% |
Ute | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 21.6% |