Lumbee vs Scandinavian Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
COMPARE
Lumbee
Scandinavian
Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 Comparison
Lumbee
Scandinavians
31.9%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG BOYS UNDER 16
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
346th/ 347
METRIC RANK
14.4%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG BOYS UNDER 16
98.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
61st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Lumbee vs Scandinavian Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 91,775,991 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Lumbee and poverty level among boys under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.111 and weighted average of 31.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 460,968,733 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Scandinavians and poverty level among boys under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.457 and weighted average of 14.4%, a difference of 121.7%.
Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Lumbee | Scandinavian |
| Minimum | 5.4% | 4.0% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| Range | 94.6% | 96.0% |
| Mean | 42.9% | 30.5% |
| Median | 42.9% | 19.0% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 28.2% | 12.6% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 50.7% | 37.4% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 22.4% | 24.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 19.5% | 26.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 19.3% | 26.5% |
Similar Demographics by Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
Demographics Similar to Lumbee by Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
In terms of child poverty among boys under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Lumbee are Tohono O'odham (31.6%, a difference of 1.1%), Puerto Rican (32.8%, a difference of 2.9%), Yuman (30.6%, a difference of 4.2%), Navajo (30.3%, a difference of 5.4%), and Pima (29.7%, a difference of 7.3%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 |
| Apache | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 24.5% |
| Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 24.5% |
| Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 24.7% |
| Sioux | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 25.3% |
| Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 25.8% |
| Hopi | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 25.9% |
| Houma | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 26.2% |
| Crow | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 26.3% |
| Immigrants | Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 28.9% |
| Pima | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 29.7% |
| Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 30.3% |
| Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 30.6% |
| Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 31.6% |
| Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 31.9% |
| Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #347 | Tragic 32.8% |
Demographics Similar to Scandinavians by Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
In terms of child poverty among boys under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Scandinavians are Immigrants from Belgium (14.4%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Czechoslovakia (14.4%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants from Sweden (14.4%, a difference of 0.16%), Polish (14.4%, a difference of 0.24%), and Immigrants from Israel (14.4%, a difference of 0.32%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 |
| Immigrants | Serbia | 99.0 /100 | #54 | Exceptional 14.3% |
| Immigrants | Pakistan | 99.0 /100 | #55 | Exceptional 14.3% |
| Zimbabweans | 99.0 /100 | #56 | Exceptional 14.3% |
| Poles | 98.9 /100 | #57 | Exceptional 14.4% |
| Immigrants | Sweden | 98.9 /100 | #58 | Exceptional 14.4% |
| Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 98.9 /100 | #59 | Exceptional 14.4% |
| Immigrants | Belgium | 98.9 /100 | #60 | Exceptional 14.4% |
| Scandinavians | 98.8 /100 | #61 | Exceptional 14.4% |
| Immigrants | Israel | 98.7 /100 | #62 | Exceptional 14.4% |
| Cambodians | 98.5 /100 | #63 | Exceptional 14.5% |
| Immigrants | Romania | 98.5 /100 | #64 | Exceptional 14.5% |
| Soviet Union | 98.5 /100 | #65 | Exceptional 14.5% |
| Immigrants | Bulgaria | 98.5 /100 | #66 | Exceptional 14.5% |
| Immigrants | Europe | 98.4 /100 | #67 | Exceptional 14.5% |
| Slovenes | 98.4 /100 | #68 | Exceptional 14.5% |