Liberian vs Tsimshian Male Poverty
COMPARE
Liberian
Tsimshian
Male Poverty
Male Poverty Comparison
Liberians
Tsimshian
12.8%
MALE POVERTY
0.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
245th/ 347
METRIC RANK
12.8%
MALE POVERTY
0.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
244th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Liberian vs Tsimshian Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 118,033,924 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Liberians and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.422 and weighted average of 12.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 15,624,889 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Tsimshian and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.352 and weighted average of 12.8%, a difference of 0.010%.

Male Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Liberian | Tsimshian |
Minimum | 0.17% | 8.5% |
Maximum | 40.3% | 21.8% |
Range | 40.1% | 13.2% |
Mean | 12.9% | 13.7% |
Median | 12.1% | 13.1% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 8.4% | 10.7% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 15.0% | 16.3% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.6% | 5.6% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.8% | 3.7% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.8% | 3.6% |
Demographics Similar to Liberians and Tsimshian by Male Poverty
In terms of male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Liberians are Alaskan Athabascan (12.8%, a difference of 0.12%), Nepalese (12.8%, a difference of 0.16%), Immigrants from El Salvador (12.8%, a difference of 0.30%), Sudanese (12.8%, a difference of 0.32%), and Immigrants from Western Africa (12.9%, a difference of 0.65%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Tsimshian are Alaskan Athabascan (12.8%, a difference of 0.11%), Nepalese (12.8%, a difference of 0.14%), Sudanese (12.8%, a difference of 0.31%), Immigrants from El Salvador (12.8%, a difference of 0.32%), and Immigrants from Middle Africa (12.7%, a difference of 0.67%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Poverty |
Immigrants | Armenia | 0.6 /100 | #234 | Tragic 12.6% |
Immigrants | Laos | 0.5 /100 | #235 | Tragic 12.6% |
Immigrants | Saudi Arabia | 0.4 /100 | #236 | Tragic 12.7% |
French American Indians | 0.4 /100 | #237 | Tragic 12.7% |
Ecuadorians | 0.4 /100 | #238 | Tragic 12.7% |
Ghanaians | 0.4 /100 | #239 | Tragic 12.7% |
Immigrants | Middle Africa | 0.4 /100 | #240 | Tragic 12.7% |
Sudanese | 0.3 /100 | #241 | Tragic 12.8% |
Nepalese | 0.3 /100 | #242 | Tragic 12.8% |
Alaskan Athabascans | 0.3 /100 | #243 | Tragic 12.8% |
Tsimshian | 0.3 /100 | #244 | Tragic 12.8% |
Liberians | 0.3 /100 | #245 | Tragic 12.8% |
Immigrants | El Salvador | 0.2 /100 | #246 | Tragic 12.8% |
Immigrants | Western Africa | 0.2 /100 | #247 | Tragic 12.9% |
Immigrants | Sudan | 0.2 /100 | #248 | Tragic 12.9% |
Potawatomi | 0.2 /100 | #249 | Tragic 12.9% |
Immigrants | Nicaragua | 0.2 /100 | #250 | Tragic 12.9% |
Immigrants | Cuba | 0.2 /100 | #251 | Tragic 12.9% |
Immigrants | Ecuador | 0.2 /100 | #252 | Tragic 12.9% |
Immigrants | Ghana | 0.2 /100 | #253 | Tragic 12.9% |
Mexican American Indians | 0.1 /100 | #254 | Tragic 13.0% |