Immigrants from Saudi Arabia vs Tsimshian Male Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Saudi Arabia
Tsimshian
Male Poverty
Male Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Saudi Arabia
Tsimshian
12.7%
MALE POVERTY
0.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
236th/ 347
METRIC RANK
12.8%
MALE POVERTY
0.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
244th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Saudi Arabia vs Tsimshian Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 164,207,457 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Saudi Arabia and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.095 and weighted average of 12.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 15,624,889 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Tsimshian and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.352 and weighted average of 12.8%, a difference of 1.0%.
Male Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Saudi Arabia | Tsimshian |
| Minimum | 1.1% | 8.5% |
| Maximum | 33.1% | 21.8% |
| Range | 32.0% | 13.2% |
| Mean | 13.2% | 13.7% |
| Median | 12.3% | 13.1% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 9.1% | 10.7% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 13.6% | 16.3% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.5% | 5.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 7.0% | 3.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.9% | 3.6% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Saudi Arabia and Tsimshian by Male Poverty
In terms of male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Saudi Arabia are French American Indian (12.7%, a difference of 0.050%), Ecuadorian (12.7%, a difference of 0.080%), Ghanaian (12.7%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Laos (12.6%, a difference of 0.25%), and Immigrants from Middle Africa (12.7%, a difference of 0.35%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Tsimshian are Liberian (12.8%, a difference of 0.010%), Alaskan Athabascan (12.8%, a difference of 0.11%), Nepalese (12.8%, a difference of 0.14%), Sudanese (12.8%, a difference of 0.31%), and Immigrants from El Salvador (12.8%, a difference of 0.32%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Poverty |
| Marshallese | 0.8 /100 | #230 | Tragic 12.5% |
| Salvadorans | 0.6 /100 | #231 | Tragic 12.6% |
| Nicaraguans | 0.6 /100 | #232 | Tragic 12.6% |
| Fijians | 0.6 /100 | #233 | Tragic 12.6% |
| Immigrants | Armenia | 0.6 /100 | #234 | Tragic 12.6% |
| Immigrants | Laos | 0.5 /100 | #235 | Tragic 12.6% |
| Immigrants | Saudi Arabia | 0.4 /100 | #236 | Tragic 12.7% |
| French American Indians | 0.4 /100 | #237 | Tragic 12.7% |
| Ecuadorians | 0.4 /100 | #238 | Tragic 12.7% |
| Ghanaians | 0.4 /100 | #239 | Tragic 12.7% |
| Immigrants | Middle Africa | 0.4 /100 | #240 | Tragic 12.7% |
| Sudanese | 0.3 /100 | #241 | Tragic 12.8% |
| Nepalese | 0.3 /100 | #242 | Tragic 12.8% |
| Alaskan Athabascans | 0.3 /100 | #243 | Tragic 12.8% |
| Tsimshian | 0.3 /100 | #244 | Tragic 12.8% |
| Liberians | 0.3 /100 | #245 | Tragic 12.8% |
| Immigrants | El Salvador | 0.2 /100 | #246 | Tragic 12.8% |
| Immigrants | Western Africa | 0.2 /100 | #247 | Tragic 12.9% |
| Immigrants | Sudan | 0.2 /100 | #248 | Tragic 12.9% |
| Potawatomi | 0.2 /100 | #249 | Tragic 12.9% |
| Immigrants | Nicaragua | 0.2 /100 | #250 | Tragic 12.9% |