Jordanian vs Chilean Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
COMPARE
Jordanian
Chilean
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Comparison
Jordanians
Chileans
14.8%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
97.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
89th/ 347
METRIC RANK
15.1%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
95.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
106th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Jordanian vs Chilean Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 165,455,872 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Jordanians and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.152 and weighted average of 14.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 253,944,579 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Chileans and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.302 and weighted average of 15.1%, a difference of 1.7%.
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Jordanian | Chilean |
Minimum | 1.7% | 5.1% |
Maximum | 38.3% | 48.3% |
Range | 36.5% | 43.2% |
Mean | 14.9% | 16.2% |
Median | 13.2% | 13.8% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 10.1% | 10.1% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 18.7% | 18.6% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 8.6% | 8.4% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 7.9% | 9.7% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 7.8% | 9.6% |
Demographics Similar to Jordanians and Chileans by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Jordanians are Northern European (14.8%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Canada (14.8%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Belarus (14.8%, a difference of 0.060%), Finnish (14.8%, a difference of 0.12%), and Austrian (14.9%, a difference of 0.41%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Chileans are Immigrants from England (15.1%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Ukraine (15.1%, a difference of 0.060%), Romanian (15.0%, a difference of 0.15%), British (15.0%, a difference of 0.31%), and Immigrants from Malaysia (15.0%, a difference of 0.33%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
Finns | 97.2 /100 | #87 | Exceptional 14.8% |
Immigrants | Canada | 97.1 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 14.8% |
Jordanians | 97.1 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 14.8% |
Northern Europeans | 97.0 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 14.8% |
Immigrants | Belarus | 97.0 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 14.8% |
Austrians | 96.7 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 14.9% |
Immigrants | North America | 96.6 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 14.9% |
Immigrants | Switzerland | 96.3 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 14.9% |
Germans | 96.3 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 14.9% |
Immigrants | France | 96.2 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 14.9% |
Immigrants | Latvia | 96.1 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 14.9% |
Basques | 95.9 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 15.0% |
Immigrants | Egypt | 95.7 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 15.0% |
Paraguayans | 95.7 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 15.0% |
Immigrants | South Africa | 95.6 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 15.0% |
Immigrants | Malaysia | 95.6 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 15.0% |
British | 95.6 /100 | #103 | Exceptional 15.0% |
Romanians | 95.3 /100 | #104 | Exceptional 15.0% |
Immigrants | England | 95.1 /100 | #105 | Exceptional 15.1% |
Chileans | 95.1 /100 | #106 | Exceptional 15.1% |
Immigrants | Ukraine | 95.0 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 15.1% |