Jordanian vs Slovak Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
COMPARE
Jordanian
Slovak
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Comparison
Jordanians
Slovaks
14.8%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
97.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
89th/ 347
METRIC RANK
15.9%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
75.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
159th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Jordanian vs Slovak Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 165,455,872 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Jordanians and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.152 and weighted average of 14.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 387,555,709 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Slovaks and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.558 and weighted average of 15.9%, a difference of 7.6%.
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Jordanian | Slovak |
Minimum | 1.7% | 4.0% |
Maximum | 38.3% | 100.0% |
Range | 36.5% | 96.0% |
Mean | 14.9% | 26.8% |
Median | 13.2% | 18.8% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 10.1% | 14.4% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 18.7% | 29.6% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 8.6% | 15.2% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 7.9% | 21.7% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 7.8% | 21.5% |
Similar Demographics by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Demographics Similar to Jordanians by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Jordanians are Northern European (14.8%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Canada (14.8%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Belarus (14.8%, a difference of 0.060%), Finnish (14.8%, a difference of 0.12%), and Australian (14.8%, a difference of 0.14%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
Macedonians | 97.6 /100 | #82 | Exceptional 14.7% |
Immigrants | Italy | 97.4 /100 | #83 | Exceptional 14.8% |
Soviet Union | 97.3 /100 | #84 | Exceptional 14.8% |
Swiss | 97.2 /100 | #85 | Exceptional 14.8% |
Australians | 97.2 /100 | #86 | Exceptional 14.8% |
Finns | 97.2 /100 | #87 | Exceptional 14.8% |
Immigrants | Canada | 97.1 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 14.8% |
Jordanians | 97.1 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 14.8% |
Northern Europeans | 97.0 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 14.8% |
Immigrants | Belarus | 97.0 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 14.8% |
Austrians | 96.7 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 14.9% |
Immigrants | North America | 96.6 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 14.9% |
Immigrants | Switzerland | 96.3 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 14.9% |
Germans | 96.3 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 14.9% |
Immigrants | France | 96.2 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 14.9% |
Demographics Similar to Slovaks by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Slovaks are Guamanian/Chamorro (15.9%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Fiji (15.9%, a difference of 0.13%), Colombian (15.9%, a difference of 0.13%), Syrian (15.9%, a difference of 0.23%), and Immigrants from Chile (15.9%, a difference of 0.24%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
Immigrants | Kuwait | 79.4 /100 | #152 | Good 15.8% |
Immigrants | Nepal | 78.5 /100 | #153 | Good 15.9% |
Immigrants | Chile | 76.7 /100 | #154 | Good 15.9% |
Syrians | 76.7 /100 | #155 | Good 15.9% |
Immigrants | Fiji | 76.1 /100 | #156 | Good 15.9% |
Colombians | 76.1 /100 | #157 | Good 15.9% |
Guamanians/Chamorros | 75.3 /100 | #158 | Good 15.9% |
Slovaks | 75.2 /100 | #159 | Good 15.9% |
French | 72.8 /100 | #160 | Good 16.0% |
Immigrants | Northern Africa | 72.0 /100 | #161 | Good 16.0% |
French Canadians | 68.7 /100 | #162 | Good 16.1% |
Immigrants | Oceania | 68.4 /100 | #163 | Good 16.1% |
Immigrants | Colombia | 67.8 /100 | #164 | Good 16.1% |
Immigrants | Germany | 67.3 /100 | #165 | Good 16.1% |
South Americans | 67.2 /100 | #166 | Good 16.1% |