Jordanian vs British Female Disability
COMPARE
Jordanian
British
Female Disability
Female Disability Comparison
Jordanians
British
11.3%
FEMALE DISABILITY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
47th/ 347
METRIC RANK
12.4%
FEMALE DISABILITY
12.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
217th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Jordanian vs British Female Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 166,415,888 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Jordanians and percentage of females with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.201 and weighted average of 11.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 531,338,456 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of British and percentage of females with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.750 and weighted average of 12.4%, a difference of 10.2%.
Female Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Jordanian | British |
| Minimum | 6.5% | 6.2% |
| Maximum | 20.5% | 100.0% |
| Range | 14.0% | 93.8% |
| Mean | 10.6% | 25.6% |
| Median | 10.9% | 16.2% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 8.6% | 12.4% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 11.6% | 25.0% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.0% | 12.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.5% | 24.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.5% | 23.9% |
Similar Demographics by Female Disability
Demographics Similar to Jordanians by Female Disability
In terms of female disability, the demographic groups most similar to Jordanians are Zimbabwean (11.3%, a difference of 0.0%), Tongan (11.3%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Nepal (11.3%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Sweden (11.3%, a difference of 0.060%), and Cambodian (11.3%, a difference of 0.10%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Disability |
| Mongolians | 100.0 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 11.2% |
| Paraguayans | 100.0 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 11.2% |
| Israelis | 100.0 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 11.2% |
| Afghans | 100.0 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 11.2% |
| Cambodians | 100.0 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 11.3% |
| Immigrants | Sweden | 100.0 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 11.3% |
| Immigrants | Nepal | 100.0 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 11.3% |
| Jordanians | 100.0 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 11.3% |
| Zimbabweans | 100.0 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 11.3% |
| Tongans | 100.0 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 11.3% |
| Inupiat | 100.0 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 11.3% |
| Immigrants | Belgium | 100.0 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 11.3% |
| Immigrants | Peru | 99.9 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 11.3% |
| Immigrants | Saudi Arabia | 99.9 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 11.3% |
| Peruvians | 99.9 /100 | #54 | Exceptional 11.3% |
Demographics Similar to British by Female Disability
In terms of female disability, the demographic groups most similar to British are Immigrants from Bahamas (12.4%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar (12.4%, a difference of 0.050%), European (12.4%, a difference of 0.050%), Panamanian (12.4%, a difference of 0.060%), and Samoan (12.4%, a difference of 0.060%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Disability |
| Swiss | 14.9 /100 | #210 | Poor 12.4% |
| Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 14.8 /100 | #211 | Poor 12.4% |
| Ute | 14.7 /100 | #212 | Poor 12.4% |
| Immigrants | Thailand | 14.5 /100 | #213 | Poor 12.4% |
| Panamanians | 13.5 /100 | #214 | Poor 12.4% |
| Samoans | 13.4 /100 | #215 | Poor 12.4% |
| Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 13.3 /100 | #216 | Poor 12.4% |
| British | 12.7 /100 | #217 | Poor 12.4% |
| Immigrants | Bahamas | 12.5 /100 | #218 | Poor 12.4% |
| Europeans | 12.1 /100 | #219 | Poor 12.4% |
| Bahamians | 11.1 /100 | #220 | Poor 12.4% |
| Native Hawaiians | 10.8 /100 | #221 | Poor 12.4% |
| Italians | 10.7 /100 | #222 | Poor 12.4% |
| Guamanians/Chamorros | 9.5 /100 | #223 | Tragic 12.5% |
| Belizeans | 9.3 /100 | #224 | Tragic 12.5% |