Jamaican vs Cape Verdean Female Poverty
COMPARE
Jamaican
Cape Verdean
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Jamaicans
Cape Verdeans
15.5%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
256th/ 347
METRIC RANK
15.6%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
259th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Jamaican vs Cape Verdean Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 367,594,174 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Jamaicans and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.064 and weighted average of 15.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 107,541,318 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Cape Verdeans and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.211 and weighted average of 15.6%, a difference of 0.30%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Jamaican | Cape Verdean |
Minimum | 5.3% | 2.0% |
Maximum | 29.8% | 33.8% |
Range | 24.5% | 31.8% |
Mean | 15.4% | 15.1% |
Median | 15.0% | 13.8% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 12.8% | 10.8% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 17.3% | 18.0% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.5% | 7.2% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.5% | 6.7% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.5% | 6.7% |
Demographics Similar to Jamaicans and Cape Verdeans by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Jamaicans are Immigrants from Jamaica (15.6%, a difference of 0.12%), Shoshone (15.6%, a difference of 0.19%), Ottawa (15.5%, a difference of 0.30%), Immigrants from Guyana (15.6%, a difference of 0.38%), and Guyanese (15.6%, a difference of 0.48%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Cape Verdeans are Immigrants from Guyana (15.6%, a difference of 0.080%), Shoshone (15.6%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Jamaica (15.6%, a difference of 0.18%), Guyanese (15.6%, a difference of 0.18%), and Mexican American Indian (15.6%, a difference of 0.18%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
Potawatomi | 0.3 /100 | #247 | Tragic 15.3% |
Immigrants | Ghana | 0.3 /100 | #248 | Tragic 15.3% |
Salvadorans | 0.3 /100 | #249 | Tragic 15.3% |
Immigrants | Western Africa | 0.3 /100 | #250 | Tragic 15.3% |
Immigrants | Trinidad and Tobago | 0.3 /100 | #251 | Tragic 15.4% |
Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 0.3 /100 | #252 | Tragic 15.4% |
Liberians | 0.2 /100 | #253 | Tragic 15.4% |
Trinidadians and Tobagonians | 0.2 /100 | #254 | Tragic 15.4% |
Ottawa | 0.2 /100 | #255 | Tragic 15.5% |
Jamaicans | 0.2 /100 | #256 | Tragic 15.5% |
Immigrants | Jamaica | 0.1 /100 | #257 | Tragic 15.6% |
Shoshone | 0.1 /100 | #258 | Tragic 15.6% |
Cape Verdeans | 0.1 /100 | #259 | Tragic 15.6% |
Immigrants | Guyana | 0.1 /100 | #260 | Tragic 15.6% |
Guyanese | 0.1 /100 | #261 | Tragic 15.6% |
Mexican American Indians | 0.1 /100 | #262 | Tragic 15.6% |
Cherokee | 0.1 /100 | #263 | Tragic 15.6% |
Immigrants | Ecuador | 0.1 /100 | #264 | Tragic 15.6% |
Immigrants | Liberia | 0.1 /100 | #265 | Tragic 15.7% |
Immigrants | El Salvador | 0.1 /100 | #266 | Tragic 15.7% |
Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.1 /100 | #267 | Tragic 15.8% |