Jamaican vs Nicaraguan Female Poverty
COMPARE
Jamaican
Nicaraguan
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Jamaicans
Nicaraguans
15.5%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
256th/ 347
METRIC RANK
15.3%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
243rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Jamaican vs Nicaraguan Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 367,594,174 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Jamaicans and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.064 and weighted average of 15.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 285,582,633 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Nicaraguans and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.119 and weighted average of 15.3%, a difference of 1.7%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Jamaican | Nicaraguan |
| Minimum | 5.3% | 2.4% |
| Maximum | 29.8% | 35.3% |
| Range | 24.5% | 32.9% |
| Mean | 15.4% | 15.5% |
| Median | 15.0% | 14.6% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 12.8% | 12.3% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 17.3% | 18.5% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.5% | 6.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.5% | 6.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.5% | 6.3% |
Demographics Similar to Jamaicans and Nicaraguans by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Jamaicans are Immigrants from Jamaica (15.6%, a difference of 0.12%), Shoshone (15.6%, a difference of 0.19%), Ottawa (15.5%, a difference of 0.30%), Cape Verdean (15.6%, a difference of 0.30%), and Trinidadian and Tobagonian (15.4%, a difference of 0.61%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Nicaraguans are Ecuadorian (15.3%, a difference of 0.050%), Spanish American Indian (15.3%, a difference of 0.15%), Cuban (15.3%, a difference of 0.20%), Potawatomi (15.3%, a difference of 0.21%), and Immigrants from Ghana (15.3%, a difference of 0.21%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Immigrants | Middle Africa | 0.5 /100 | #239 | Tragic 15.2% |
| Sudanese | 0.5 /100 | #240 | Tragic 15.2% |
| Immigrants | Sudan | 0.4 /100 | #241 | Tragic 15.2% |
| Nepalese | 0.4 /100 | #242 | Tragic 15.2% |
| Nicaraguans | 0.3 /100 | #243 | Tragic 15.3% |
| Ecuadorians | 0.3 /100 | #244 | Tragic 15.3% |
| Spanish American Indians | 0.3 /100 | #245 | Tragic 15.3% |
| Cubans | 0.3 /100 | #246 | Tragic 15.3% |
| Potawatomi | 0.3 /100 | #247 | Tragic 15.3% |
| Immigrants | Ghana | 0.3 /100 | #248 | Tragic 15.3% |
| Salvadorans | 0.3 /100 | #249 | Tragic 15.3% |
| Immigrants | Western Africa | 0.3 /100 | #250 | Tragic 15.3% |
| Immigrants | Trinidad and Tobago | 0.3 /100 | #251 | Tragic 15.4% |
| Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 0.3 /100 | #252 | Tragic 15.4% |
| Liberians | 0.2 /100 | #253 | Tragic 15.4% |
| Trinidadians and Tobagonians | 0.2 /100 | #254 | Tragic 15.4% |
| Ottawa | 0.2 /100 | #255 | Tragic 15.5% |
| Jamaicans | 0.2 /100 | #256 | Tragic 15.5% |
| Immigrants | Jamaica | 0.1 /100 | #257 | Tragic 15.6% |
| Shoshone | 0.1 /100 | #258 | Tragic 15.6% |
| Cape Verdeans | 0.1 /100 | #259 | Tragic 15.6% |