American vs Ecuadorian Female Poverty
COMPARE
American
Ecuadorian
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Americans
Ecuadorians
14.6%
FEMALE POVERTY
2.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
224th/ 347
METRIC RANK
15.3%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
244th/ 347
METRIC RANK
American vs Ecuadorian Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 580,452,032 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Americans and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.484 and weighted average of 14.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 317,585,196 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Ecuadorians and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.054 and weighted average of 15.3%, a difference of 4.8%.

Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | American | Ecuadorian |
Minimum | 2.7% | 0.14% |
Maximum | 92.7% | 28.7% |
Range | 90.0% | 28.5% |
Mean | 23.2% | 14.8% |
Median | 19.4% | 14.1% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 15.6% | 11.7% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 24.2% | 17.6% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 8.5% | 5.9% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 14.5% | 5.7% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 14.5% | 5.7% |
Demographics Similar to Americans and Ecuadorians by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Americans are Immigrants from Micronesia (14.6%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Eritrea (14.6%, a difference of 0.33%), Immigrants from Nigeria (14.7%, a difference of 0.64%), German Russian (14.7%, a difference of 0.79%), and Ghanaian (14.7%, a difference of 0.85%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Ecuadorians are Nicaraguan (15.3%, a difference of 0.050%), Nepalese (15.2%, a difference of 0.29%), Immigrants from Sudan (15.2%, a difference of 0.41%), Sudanese (15.2%, a difference of 0.66%), and Immigrants from Middle Africa (15.2%, a difference of 0.72%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
Americans | 2.8 /100 | #224 | Tragic 14.6% |
Immigrants | Micronesia | 2.8 /100 | #225 | Tragic 14.6% |
Immigrants | Eritrea | 2.4 /100 | #226 | Tragic 14.6% |
Immigrants | Nigeria | 2.1 /100 | #227 | Tragic 14.7% |
German Russians | 2.0 /100 | #228 | Tragic 14.7% |
Ghanaians | 1.9 /100 | #229 | Tragic 14.7% |
Alaska Natives | 1.8 /100 | #230 | Tragic 14.7% |
Nigerians | 1.7 /100 | #231 | Tragic 14.8% |
Osage | 1.5 /100 | #232 | Tragic 14.8% |
Immigrants | Saudi Arabia | 1.4 /100 | #233 | Tragic 14.8% |
Fijians | 1.1 /100 | #234 | Tragic 14.9% |
Immigrants | Laos | 0.9 /100 | #235 | Tragic 15.0% |
Cree | 0.7 /100 | #236 | Tragic 15.1% |
French American Indians | 0.6 /100 | #237 | Tragic 15.1% |
Immigrants | Armenia | 0.6 /100 | #238 | Tragic 15.1% |
Immigrants | Middle Africa | 0.5 /100 | #239 | Tragic 15.2% |
Sudanese | 0.5 /100 | #240 | Tragic 15.2% |
Immigrants | Sudan | 0.4 /100 | #241 | Tragic 15.2% |
Nepalese | 0.4 /100 | #242 | Tragic 15.2% |
Nicaraguans | 0.3 /100 | #243 | Tragic 15.3% |
Ecuadorians | 0.3 /100 | #244 | Tragic 15.3% |