Inupiat vs Hmong Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Inupiat
Hmong
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Inupiat
Hmong
23.1%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
0.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
270th/ 347
METRIC RANK
23.1%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
0.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
269th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Inupiat vs Hmong Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 95,986,972 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Inupiat and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.161 and weighted average of 23.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 24,642,418 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Hmong and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.335 and weighted average of 23.1%, a difference of 0.26%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Inupiat | Hmong |
| Minimum | 8.3% | 4.3% |
| Maximum | 73.6% | 53.4% |
| Range | 65.3% | 49.1% |
| Mean | 30.3% | 25.8% |
| Median | 24.4% | 22.9% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 17.1% | 19.1% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 40.1% | 32.5% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 23.1% | 13.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 18.6% | 11.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 18.4% | 10.9% |
Demographics Similar to Inupiat and Hmong by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Inupiat are Subsaharan African (23.2%, a difference of 0.25%), Fijian (23.1%, a difference of 0.28%), Senegalese (23.0%, a difference of 0.35%), Immigrants from Micronesia (23.0%, a difference of 0.41%), and Immigrants from Senegal (23.2%, a difference of 0.43%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Hmong are Fijian (23.1%, a difference of 0.030%), Senegalese (23.0%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Micronesia (23.0%, a difference of 0.16%), Central American (23.0%, a difference of 0.37%), and Subsaharan African (23.2%, a difference of 0.50%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Whites/Caucasians | 0.6 /100 | #259 | Tragic 22.7% |
| Celtics | 0.5 /100 | #260 | Tragic 22.7% |
| Immigrants | Cabo Verde | 0.4 /100 | #261 | Tragic 22.8% |
| British West Indians | 0.4 /100 | #262 | Tragic 22.8% |
| Scotch-Irish | 0.3 /100 | #263 | Tragic 22.9% |
| Immigrants | Laos | 0.3 /100 | #264 | Tragic 22.9% |
| Central Americans | 0.2 /100 | #265 | Tragic 23.0% |
| Immigrants | Micronesia | 0.2 /100 | #266 | Tragic 23.0% |
| Senegalese | 0.2 /100 | #267 | Tragic 23.0% |
| Fijians | 0.2 /100 | #268 | Tragic 23.1% |
| Hmong | 0.2 /100 | #269 | Tragic 23.1% |
| Inupiat | 0.2 /100 | #270 | Tragic 23.1% |
| Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.1 /100 | #271 | Tragic 23.2% |
| Immigrants | Senegal | 0.1 /100 | #272 | Tragic 23.2% |
| Alaska Natives | 0.1 /100 | #273 | Tragic 23.3% |
| Marshallese | 0.1 /100 | #274 | Tragic 23.3% |
| Mexican American Indians | 0.1 /100 | #275 | Tragic 23.4% |
| Immigrants | Azores | 0.0 /100 | #276 | Tragic 23.5% |
| Pennsylvania Germans | 0.0 /100 | #277 | Tragic 23.6% |
| Immigrants | Nonimmigrants | 0.0 /100 | #278 | Tragic 23.6% |
| Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #279 | Tragic 23.6% |