Immigrants from Latin America vs Hmong Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Latin America
Hmong
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Latin America
Hmong
23.7%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
280th/ 347
METRIC RANK
23.1%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
0.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
269th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Latin America vs Hmong Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 541,789,164 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Latin America and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.074 and weighted average of 23.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 24,642,418 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Hmong and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.335 and weighted average of 23.1%, a difference of 2.8%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Latin America | Hmong |
| Minimum | 8.5% | 4.3% |
| Maximum | 68.5% | 53.4% |
| Range | 60.0% | 49.1% |
| Mean | 23.7% | 25.8% |
| Median | 23.4% | 22.9% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 21.3% | 19.1% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 26.5% | 32.5% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.2% | 13.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.4% | 11.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.4% | 10.9% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Latin America and Hmong by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Latin America are Alaskan Athabascan (23.6%, a difference of 0.49%), Immigrants from Zaire (23.8%, a difference of 0.51%), Nonimmigrants (23.6%, a difference of 0.53%), Guatemalan (23.8%, a difference of 0.56%), and Pennsylvania German (23.6%, a difference of 0.60%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Hmong are Fijian (23.1%, a difference of 0.030%), Senegalese (23.0%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Micronesia (23.0%, a difference of 0.16%), Inupiat (23.1%, a difference of 0.26%), and Central American (23.0%, a difference of 0.37%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Immigrants | Laos | 0.3 /100 | #264 | Tragic 22.9% |
| Central Americans | 0.2 /100 | #265 | Tragic 23.0% |
| Immigrants | Micronesia | 0.2 /100 | #266 | Tragic 23.0% |
| Senegalese | 0.2 /100 | #267 | Tragic 23.0% |
| Fijians | 0.2 /100 | #268 | Tragic 23.1% |
| Hmong | 0.2 /100 | #269 | Tragic 23.1% |
| Inupiat | 0.2 /100 | #270 | Tragic 23.1% |
| Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.1 /100 | #271 | Tragic 23.2% |
| Immigrants | Senegal | 0.1 /100 | #272 | Tragic 23.2% |
| Alaska Natives | 0.1 /100 | #273 | Tragic 23.3% |
| Marshallese | 0.1 /100 | #274 | Tragic 23.3% |
| Mexican American Indians | 0.1 /100 | #275 | Tragic 23.4% |
| Immigrants | Azores | 0.0 /100 | #276 | Tragic 23.5% |
| Pennsylvania Germans | 0.0 /100 | #277 | Tragic 23.6% |
| Immigrants | Nonimmigrants | 0.0 /100 | #278 | Tragic 23.6% |
| Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #279 | Tragic 23.6% |
| Immigrants | Latin America | 0.0 /100 | #280 | Tragic 23.7% |
| Immigrants | Zaire | 0.0 /100 | #281 | Tragic 23.8% |
| Guatemalans | 0.0 /100 | #282 | Tragic 23.8% |
| German Russians | 0.0 /100 | #283 | Tragic 23.9% |
| Immigrants | Dominica | 0.0 /100 | #284 | Tragic 23.9% |