Immigrants vs Yugoslavian Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants
Yugoslavian
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Immigrants
Yugoslavians
21.4%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
22.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
199th/ 347
METRIC RANK
21.2%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
35.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
188th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants vs Yugoslavian Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 556,808,964 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.303 and weighted average of 21.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 282,795,313 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Yugoslavians and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.236 and weighted average of 21.2%, a difference of 1.0%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants | Yugoslavian |
| Minimum | 10.5% | 2.0% |
| Maximum | 47.5% | 50.2% |
| Range | 36.9% | 48.2% |
| Mean | 21.2% | 22.1% |
| Median | 20.7% | 20.5% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 18.9% | 17.0% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 22.6% | 23.9% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.8% | 7.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.4% | 10.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.4% | 10.3% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants and Yugoslavians by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants are Irish (21.4%, a difference of 0.050%), Nigerian (21.4%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Kenya (21.4%, a difference of 0.12%), Swiss (21.4%, a difference of 0.19%), and Immigrants from Haiti (21.5%, a difference of 0.30%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Yugoslavians are Immigrants from Cuba (21.2%, a difference of 0.010%), Trinidadian and Tobagonian (21.2%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Nigeria (21.2%, a difference of 0.090%), Hawaiian (21.2%, a difference of 0.15%), and Immigrants from Cambodia (21.2%, a difference of 0.19%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Slovaks | 39.7 /100 | #183 | Fair 21.1% |
| Hungarians | 39.6 /100 | #184 | Fair 21.1% |
| Immigrants | Cambodia | 38.2 /100 | #185 | Fair 21.2% |
| Hawaiians | 37.7 /100 | #186 | Fair 21.2% |
| Immigrants | Nigeria | 36.8 /100 | #187 | Fair 21.2% |
| Yugoslavians | 35.4 /100 | #188 | Fair 21.2% |
| Immigrants | Cuba | 35.3 /100 | #189 | Fair 21.2% |
| Trinidadians and Tobagonians | 35.2 /100 | #190 | Fair 21.2% |
| Immigrants | Germany | 31.1 /100 | #191 | Fair 21.3% |
| Immigrants | Jamaica | 30.5 /100 | #192 | Fair 21.3% |
| Basques | 28.1 /100 | #193 | Fair 21.3% |
| Czechoslovakians | 27.7 /100 | #194 | Fair 21.3% |
| Nicaraguans | 27.6 /100 | #195 | Fair 21.3% |
| Immigrants | Saudi Arabia | 27.1 /100 | #196 | Fair 21.3% |
| Japanese | 26.4 /100 | #197 | Fair 21.3% |
| Swiss | 24.2 /100 | #198 | Fair 21.4% |
| Immigrants | Immigrants | 22.0 /100 | #199 | Fair 21.4% |
| Irish | 21.4 /100 | #200 | Fair 21.4% |
| Nigerians | 20.9 /100 | #201 | Fair 21.4% |
| Immigrants | Kenya | 20.7 /100 | #202 | Fair 21.4% |
| Immigrants | Haiti | 18.8 /100 | #203 | Poor 21.5% |