Immigrants from Zimbabwe vs Brazilian Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Zimbabwe
Brazilian
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Zimbabwe
Brazilians
20.0%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
95.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
113th/ 347
METRIC RANK
20.1%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
94.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
123rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Zimbabwe vs Brazilian Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 117,320,666 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Zimbabwe and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.481 and weighted average of 20.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 319,523,574 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Brazilians and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.410 and weighted average of 20.1%, a difference of 0.51%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Zimbabwe | Brazilian |
Minimum | 7.9% | 4.3% |
Maximum | 59.7% | 58.7% |
Range | 51.9% | 54.4% |
Mean | 25.1% | 22.4% |
Median | 21.7% | 19.7% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 16.2% | 17.3% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 33.7% | 23.9% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 17.6% | 6.6% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 13.4% | 10.5% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 13.2% | 10.4% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Brazilians by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Zimbabwe are Immigrants from Colombia (20.0%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Northern Africa (20.0%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Netherlands (20.0%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Kazakhstan (20.0%, a difference of 0.060%), and Polish (20.0%, a difference of 0.10%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Brazilians are Immigrants from Chile (20.1%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from South Africa (20.1%, a difference of 0.15%), Immigrants from South America (20.0%, a difference of 0.18%), Immigrants from Switzerland (20.0%, a difference of 0.21%), and South American (20.0%, a difference of 0.24%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
Native Hawaiians | 96.6 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 19.9% |
Colombians | 96.6 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 19.9% |
Immigrants | Western Asia | 96.5 /100 | #110 | Exceptional 19.9% |
Carpatho Rusyns | 96.1 /100 | #111 | Exceptional 20.0% |
Immigrants | Netherlands | 96.0 /100 | #112 | Exceptional 20.0% |
Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 95.9 /100 | #113 | Exceptional 20.0% |
Immigrants | Colombia | 95.9 /100 | #114 | Exceptional 20.0% |
Immigrants | Northern Africa | 95.8 /100 | #115 | Exceptional 20.0% |
Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 95.7 /100 | #116 | Exceptional 20.0% |
Poles | 95.6 /100 | #117 | Exceptional 20.0% |
Immigrants | Afghanistan | 95.4 /100 | #118 | Exceptional 20.0% |
Immigrants | Ethiopia | 95.4 /100 | #119 | Exceptional 20.0% |
South Americans | 95.1 /100 | #120 | Exceptional 20.0% |
Immigrants | Switzerland | 95.1 /100 | #121 | Exceptional 20.0% |
Immigrants | South America | 95.0 /100 | #122 | Exceptional 20.0% |
Brazilians | 94.4 /100 | #123 | Exceptional 20.1% |
Immigrants | Chile | 94.3 /100 | #124 | Exceptional 20.1% |
Immigrants | South Africa | 93.9 /100 | #125 | Exceptional 20.1% |
Serbians | 93.3 /100 | #126 | Exceptional 20.1% |
Mongolians | 93.2 /100 | #127 | Exceptional 20.2% |
Immigrants | Spain | 92.7 /100 | #128 | Exceptional 20.2% |