Immigrants from Yemen vs Puget Sound Salish Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
COMPARE
Immigrants from Yemen
Puget Sound Salish
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Comparison
Immigrants from Yemen
Puget Sound Salish
29.5%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
343rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
15.4%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
90.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
130th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Yemen vs Puget Sound Salish Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 82,295,709 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Yemen and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.461 and weighted average of 29.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 45,926,658 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Puget Sound Salish and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.102 and weighted average of 15.4%, a difference of 91.2%.
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Yemen | Puget Sound Salish |
Minimum | 3.9% | 3.7% |
Maximum | 61.8% | 34.1% |
Range | 57.9% | 30.4% |
Mean | 31.7% | 17.0% |
Median | 31.7% | 17.0% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 20.8% | 10.2% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 40.8% | 23.5% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 20.0% | 13.3% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 13.4% | 8.7% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 13.2% | 8.5% |
Similar Demographics by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Yemen by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Yemen are Navajo (30.5%, a difference of 3.3%), Lumbee (30.7%, a difference of 4.1%), Pima (28.2%, a difference of 4.5%), Hopi (27.9%, a difference of 5.9%), and Tohono O'odham (31.6%, a difference of 7.2%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 24.7% |
Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 25.0% |
Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 25.2% |
Sioux | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 25.6% |
Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 25.8% |
Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 26.3% |
Crow | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 26.4% |
Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 27.1% |
Hopi | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 27.9% |
Pima | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 28.2% |
Immigrants | Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 29.5% |
Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 30.5% |
Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 30.7% |
Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 31.6% |
Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #347 | Tragic 32.7% |
Demographics Similar to Puget Sound Salish by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Puget Sound Salish are Immigrants from Western Europe (15.4%, a difference of 0.020%), Mongolian (15.4%, a difference of 0.13%), Brazilian (15.4%, a difference of 0.15%), Immigrants from South Eastern Asia (15.4%, a difference of 0.16%), and Albanian (15.4%, a difference of 0.17%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
Irish | 91.5 /100 | #123 | Exceptional 15.3% |
Carpatho Rusyns | 91.4 /100 | #124 | Exceptional 15.3% |
Peruvians | 91.2 /100 | #125 | Exceptional 15.4% |
Scottish | 91.0 /100 | #126 | Exceptional 15.4% |
Immigrants | Norway | 90.8 /100 | #127 | Exceptional 15.4% |
Albanians | 90.5 /100 | #128 | Exceptional 15.4% |
Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 90.5 /100 | #129 | Exceptional 15.4% |
Puget Sound Salish | 90.1 /100 | #130 | Exceptional 15.4% |
Immigrants | Western Europe | 90.0 /100 | #131 | Exceptional 15.4% |
Mongolians | 89.7 /100 | #132 | Excellent 15.4% |
Brazilians | 89.6 /100 | #133 | Excellent 15.4% |
Immigrants | Spain | 89.1 /100 | #134 | Excellent 15.5% |
Czechoslovakians | 89.0 /100 | #135 | Excellent 15.5% |
Native Hawaiians | 89.0 /100 | #136 | Excellent 15.5% |
South Africans | 88.7 /100 | #137 | Excellent 15.5% |