Immigrants from Vietnam vs Bhutanese Single Male Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Vietnam
Bhutanese
Single Male Poverty
Single Male Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Vietnam
Bhutanese
11.4%
SINGLE MALE POVERTY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
33rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
11.1%
SINGLE MALE POVERTY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
16th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Vietnam vs Bhutanese Single Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 361,378,073 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Vietnam and poverty level among single males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.127 and weighted average of 11.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 397,447,211 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Bhutanese and poverty level among single males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.032 and weighted average of 11.1%, a difference of 3.3%.

Single Male Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Vietnam | Bhutanese |
Minimum | 3.5% | 1.6% |
Maximum | 23.0% | 57.1% |
Range | 19.5% | 55.5% |
Mean | 11.2% | 13.5% |
Median | 11.3% | 11.1% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 9.5% | 7.1% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 12.8% | 15.5% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.3% | 8.4% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.5% | 10.2% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.5% | 10.2% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Vietnam and Bhutanese by Single Male Poverty
In terms of single male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Vietnam are Immigrants from Ethiopia (11.4%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Eastern Asia (11.4%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Iran (11.4%, a difference of 0.16%), Iranian (11.4%, a difference of 0.24%), and Immigrants from Egypt (11.4%, a difference of 0.30%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Bhutanese are Tsimshian (11.1%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Bolivia (11.1%, a difference of 0.42%), Korean (11.0%, a difference of 0.75%), Chinese (11.0%, a difference of 0.81%), and Immigrants from Moldova (11.2%, a difference of 0.81%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Male Poverty |
Chinese | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 11.0% |
Koreans | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 11.0% |
Bhutanese | 100.0 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 11.1% |
Tsimshian | 100.0 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 11.1% |
Immigrants | Bolivia | 100.0 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 11.1% |
Immigrants | Moldova | 100.0 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 11.2% |
Ethiopians | 100.0 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 11.2% |
Asians | 100.0 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 11.2% |
Immigrants | Pakistan | 100.0 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 11.2% |
Bolivians | 100.0 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 11.2% |
Indians (Asian) | 100.0 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 11.3% |
Maltese | 100.0 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 11.3% |
Immigrants | Japan | 100.0 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 11.3% |
Immigrants | China | 100.0 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 11.4% |
Immigrants | Asia | 100.0 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 11.4% |
Immigrants | Egypt | 100.0 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 11.4% |
Iranians | 100.0 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 11.4% |
Immigrants | Iran | 100.0 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 11.4% |
Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 100.0 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 11.4% |
Immigrants | Vietnam | 100.0 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 11.4% |
Immigrants | Ethiopia | 100.0 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 11.4% |