Immigrants from South Eastern Asia vs Icelander Female Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from South Eastern Asia
Icelander
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from South Eastern Asia
Icelanders
12.7%
FEMALE POVERTY
89.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
123rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
13.0%
FEMALE POVERTY
81.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
141st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from South Eastern Asia vs Icelander Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 512,071,275 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from South Eastern Asia and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.419 and weighted average of 12.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 159,608,280 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Icelanders and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.234 and weighted average of 13.0%, a difference of 1.9%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from South Eastern Asia | Icelander |
| Minimum | 5.8% | 0.47% |
| Maximum | 62.5% | 33.3% |
| Range | 56.7% | 32.9% |
| Mean | 13.4% | 11.8% |
| Median | 12.2% | 10.4% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 10.6% | 6.2% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 14.0% | 14.1% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.4% | 7.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 7.4% | 7.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 7.3% | 7.8% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from South Eastern Asia and Icelanders by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from South Eastern Asia are French Canadian (12.7%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Norway (12.8%, a difference of 0.18%), Argentinean (12.8%, a difference of 0.23%), Immigrants from Ukraine (12.8%, a difference of 0.30%), and South African (12.8%, a difference of 0.41%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Icelanders are Brazilian (13.0%, a difference of 0.10%), Pakistani (12.9%, a difference of 0.32%), Basque (12.9%, a difference of 0.34%), Immigrants from France (12.9%, a difference of 0.43%), and Chilean (12.9%, a difference of 0.65%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| French Canadians | 90.2 /100 | #122 | Exceptional 12.7% |
| Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 89.9 /100 | #123 | Excellent 12.7% |
| Immigrants | Norway | 89.3 /100 | #124 | Excellent 12.8% |
| Argentineans | 89.1 /100 | #125 | Excellent 12.8% |
| Immigrants | Ukraine | 88.8 /100 | #126 | Excellent 12.8% |
| South Africans | 88.4 /100 | #127 | Excellent 12.8% |
| Immigrants | Belarus | 88.2 /100 | #128 | Excellent 12.8% |
| Immigrants | Brazil | 87.9 /100 | #129 | Excellent 12.8% |
| Immigrants | Vietnam | 87.1 /100 | #130 | Excellent 12.8% |
| Immigrants | Argentina | 87.0 /100 | #131 | Excellent 12.8% |
| Immigrants | Jordan | 86.9 /100 | #132 | Excellent 12.8% |
| Immigrants | Western Europe | 86.6 /100 | #133 | Excellent 12.8% |
| Immigrants | Switzerland | 85.8 /100 | #134 | Excellent 12.9% |
| French | 85.6 /100 | #135 | Excellent 12.9% |
| Peruvians | 85.2 /100 | #136 | Excellent 12.9% |
| Chileans | 84.7 /100 | #137 | Excellent 12.9% |
| Immigrants | France | 83.6 /100 | #138 | Excellent 12.9% |
| Basques | 83.1 /100 | #139 | Excellent 12.9% |
| Pakistanis | 83.0 /100 | #140 | Excellent 12.9% |
| Icelanders | 81.1 /100 | #141 | Excellent 13.0% |
| Brazilians | 80.5 /100 | #142 | Excellent 13.0% |