Immigrants from Norway vs Icelander Female Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Norway
Icelander
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Norway
Icelanders
12.8%
FEMALE POVERTY
89.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
124th/ 347
METRIC RANK
13.0%
FEMALE POVERTY
81.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
141st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Norway vs Icelander Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 116,674,936 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Norway and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.325 and weighted average of 12.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 159,608,280 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Icelanders and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.234 and weighted average of 13.0%, a difference of 1.7%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Norway | Icelander |
Minimum | 0.68% | 0.47% |
Maximum | 41.6% | 33.3% |
Range | 40.9% | 32.9% |
Mean | 10.8% | 11.8% |
Median | 9.1% | 10.4% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.8% | 6.2% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 11.6% | 14.1% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.8% | 7.8% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 10.0% | 7.9% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 9.8% | 7.8% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Norway and Icelanders by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Norway are Argentinean (12.8%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Ukraine (12.8%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from South Eastern Asia (12.7%, a difference of 0.18%), South African (12.8%, a difference of 0.23%), and French Canadian (12.7%, a difference of 0.24%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Icelanders are Brazilian (13.0%, a difference of 0.10%), Pakistani (12.9%, a difference of 0.32%), Basque (12.9%, a difference of 0.34%), Immigrants from France (12.9%, a difference of 0.43%), and Chilean (12.9%, a difference of 0.65%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
French Canadians | 90.2 /100 | #122 | Exceptional 12.7% |
Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 89.9 /100 | #123 | Excellent 12.7% |
Immigrants | Norway | 89.3 /100 | #124 | Excellent 12.8% |
Argentineans | 89.1 /100 | #125 | Excellent 12.8% |
Immigrants | Ukraine | 88.8 /100 | #126 | Excellent 12.8% |
South Africans | 88.4 /100 | #127 | Excellent 12.8% |
Immigrants | Belarus | 88.2 /100 | #128 | Excellent 12.8% |
Immigrants | Brazil | 87.9 /100 | #129 | Excellent 12.8% |
Immigrants | Vietnam | 87.1 /100 | #130 | Excellent 12.8% |
Immigrants | Argentina | 87.0 /100 | #131 | Excellent 12.8% |
Immigrants | Jordan | 86.9 /100 | #132 | Excellent 12.8% |
Immigrants | Western Europe | 86.6 /100 | #133 | Excellent 12.8% |
Immigrants | Switzerland | 85.8 /100 | #134 | Excellent 12.9% |
French | 85.6 /100 | #135 | Excellent 12.9% |
Peruvians | 85.2 /100 | #136 | Excellent 12.9% |
Chileans | 84.7 /100 | #137 | Excellent 12.9% |
Immigrants | France | 83.6 /100 | #138 | Excellent 12.9% |
Basques | 83.1 /100 | #139 | Excellent 12.9% |
Pakistanis | 83.0 /100 | #140 | Excellent 12.9% |
Icelanders | 81.1 /100 | #141 | Excellent 13.0% |
Brazilians | 80.5 /100 | #142 | Excellent 13.0% |