Immigrants from South Central Asia vs Italian Family Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from South Central Asia
Italian
Family Poverty
Family Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from South Central Asia
Italians
7.2%
FAMILY POVERTY
99.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
16th/ 347
METRIC RANK
7.4%
FAMILY POVERTY
99.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
30th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from South Central Asia vs Italian Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 471,025,257 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from South Central Asia and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.489 and weighted average of 7.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 569,861,523 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Italians and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.628 and weighted average of 7.4%, a difference of 2.8%.
Family Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from South Central Asia | Italian |
| Minimum | 0.60% | 1.5% |
| Maximum | 15.8% | 100.0% |
| Range | 15.2% | 98.5% |
| Mean | 5.4% | 11.4% |
| Median | 5.2% | 6.1% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.7% | 4.0% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 6.5% | 8.8% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.9% | 4.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.5% | 18.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.5% | 18.8% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from South Central Asia and Italians by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from South Central Asia are Luxembourger (7.2%, a difference of 0.22%), Immigrants from Lithuania (7.2%, a difference of 0.24%), Lithuanian (7.2%, a difference of 0.27%), Eastern European (7.2%, a difference of 0.54%), and Immigrants from Hong Kong (7.3%, a difference of 0.70%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Italians are Czech (7.4%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Northern Europe (7.4%, a difference of 0.29%), Polish (7.4%, a difference of 0.42%), Immigrants from Japan (7.4%, a difference of 0.42%), and Immigrants from Korea (7.4%, a difference of 0.46%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
| Swedes | 99.8 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 7.1% |
| Iranians | 99.8 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 7.1% |
| Lithuanians | 99.8 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 7.2% |
| Immigrants | South Central Asia | 99.8 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 7.2% |
| Luxembourgers | 99.8 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 7.2% |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.8 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 7.2% |
| Eastern Europeans | 99.7 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 7.2% |
| Immigrants | Hong Kong | 99.7 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 7.3% |
| Immigrants | Iran | 99.7 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 7.3% |
| Danes | 99.7 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 7.3% |
| Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 99.7 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 7.3% |
| Croatians | 99.7 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 7.3% |
| Burmese | 99.7 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 7.3% |
| Cypriots | 99.6 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 7.3% |
| Immigrants | Scotland | 99.6 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 7.3% |
| Immigrants | Korea | 99.6 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 7.4% |
| Immigrants | Northern Europe | 99.6 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 7.4% |
| Italians | 99.6 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 7.4% |
| Czechs | 99.6 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 7.4% |
| Poles | 99.5 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 7.4% |
| Immigrants | Japan | 99.5 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 7.4% |