Croatian vs Italian Family Poverty
COMPARE
Croatian
Italian
Family Poverty
Family Poverty Comparison
Croatians
Italians
7.3%
FAMILY POVERTY
99.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
24th/ 347
METRIC RANK
7.4%
FAMILY POVERTY
99.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
30th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Croatian vs Italian Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 374,582,342 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Croatians and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.422 and weighted average of 7.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 569,861,523 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Italians and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.628 and weighted average of 7.4%, a difference of 1.1%.
Family Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Croatian | Italian |
| Minimum | 1.8% | 1.5% |
| Maximum | 28.1% | 100.0% |
| Range | 26.3% | 98.5% |
| Mean | 8.9% | 11.4% |
| Median | 6.8% | 6.1% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.7% | 4.0% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 10.2% | 8.8% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.4% | 4.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.3% | 18.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.3% | 18.8% |
Demographics Similar to Croatians and Italians by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Croatians are Burmese (7.3%, a difference of 0.0%), Cypriot (7.3%, a difference of 0.25%), Immigrants from Scotland (7.3%, a difference of 0.26%), Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac (7.3%, a difference of 0.30%), and Danish (7.3%, a difference of 0.31%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Italians are Czech (7.4%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Northern Europe (7.4%, a difference of 0.29%), Polish (7.4%, a difference of 0.42%), Immigrants from Japan (7.4%, a difference of 0.42%), and Immigrants from Korea (7.4%, a difference of 0.46%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
| Luxembourgers | 99.8 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 7.2% |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.8 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 7.2% |
| Eastern Europeans | 99.7 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 7.2% |
| Immigrants | Hong Kong | 99.7 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 7.3% |
| Immigrants | Iran | 99.7 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 7.3% |
| Danes | 99.7 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 7.3% |
| Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 99.7 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 7.3% |
| Croatians | 99.7 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 7.3% |
| Burmese | 99.7 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 7.3% |
| Cypriots | 99.6 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 7.3% |
| Immigrants | Scotland | 99.6 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 7.3% |
| Immigrants | Korea | 99.6 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 7.4% |
| Immigrants | Northern Europe | 99.6 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 7.4% |
| Italians | 99.6 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 7.4% |
| Czechs | 99.6 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 7.4% |
| Poles | 99.5 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 7.4% |
| Immigrants | Japan | 99.5 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 7.4% |
| Russians | 99.5 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 7.5% |
| Greeks | 99.4 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 7.5% |
| Turks | 99.4 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 7.5% |
| Estonians | 99.4 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 7.5% |