Immigrants from Kuwait vs Mongolian Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Kuwait
 Mongolian
 Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Kuwait
Mongolians
20.3%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
90.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
139th/ 347
METRIC RANK
20.2%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
93.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
127th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Kuwait vs Mongolian Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 136,370,378 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Kuwait and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.219 and weighted average of 20.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 139,671,707 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Mongolians and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.114 and weighted average of 20.2%, a difference of 0.60%.
 
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Kuwait | Mongolian | 
| Minimum | 10.8% | 3.5% | 
| Maximum | 42.0% | 47.1% | 
| Range | 31.3% | 43.6% | 
| Mean | 22.4% | 19.9% | 
| Median | 21.7% | 19.2% | 
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 17.7% | 12.8% | 
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 25.5% | 23.7% | 
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.9% | 10.9% | 
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 7.3% | 9.6% | 
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 7.2% | 9.5% | 
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Kuwait and Mongolians by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Kuwait are Slovene (20.3%, a difference of 0.010%), Syrian (20.3%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Nepal (20.3%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Canada (20.2%, a difference of 0.15%), and Immigrants from Iraq (20.2%, a difference of 0.16%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Mongolians are Serbian (20.1%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Spain (20.2%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from South Africa (20.1%, a difference of 0.19%), Immigrants from Morocco (20.2%, a difference of 0.19%), and Immigrants from Hungary (20.2%, a difference of 0.21%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty | 
| Brazilians | 94.4 /100 | #123  | Exceptional 20.1%  | 
| Immigrants | Chile | 94.3 /100 | #124  | Exceptional 20.1%  | 
| Immigrants | South Africa | 93.9 /100 | #125  | Exceptional 20.1%  | 
| Serbians | 93.3 /100 | #126  | Exceptional 20.1%  | 
| Mongolians | 93.2 /100 | #127  | Exceptional 20.2%  | 
| Immigrants | Spain | 92.7 /100 | #128  | Exceptional 20.2%  | 
| Immigrants | Morocco | 92.4 /100 | #129  | Exceptional 20.2%  | 
| Immigrants | Hungary | 92.3 /100 | #130  | Exceptional 20.2%  | 
| Pakistanis | 92.1 /100 | #131  | Exceptional 20.2%  | 
| Uruguayans | 92.1 /100 | #132  | Exceptional 20.2%  | 
| Immigrants | England | 91.9 /100 | #133  | Exceptional 20.2%  | 
| Immigrants | Venezuela | 91.5 /100 | #134  | Exceptional 20.2%  | 
| Immigrants | Iraq | 91.2 /100 | #135  | Exceptional 20.2%  | 
| Immigrants | Canada | 91.2 /100 | #136  | Exceptional 20.2%  | 
| Immigrants | Nepal | 90.6 /100 | #137  | Exceptional 20.3%  | 
| Slovenes | 90.5 /100 | #138  | Exceptional 20.3%  | 
| Immigrants | Kuwait | 90.4 /100 | #139  | Exceptional 20.3%  | 
| Syrians | 90.4 /100 | #140  | Exceptional 20.3%  | 
| Immigrants | North America | 89.5 /100 | #141  | Excellent 20.3%  | 
| Immigrants | Uganda | 89.1 /100 | #142  | Excellent 20.3%  | 
| Australians | 88.4 /100 | #143  | Excellent 20.3%  |