Immigrants from Chile vs Mongolian Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Chile
Mongolian
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Chile
Mongolians
20.1%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
94.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
124th/ 347
METRIC RANK
20.2%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
93.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
127th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Chile vs Mongolian Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 216,927,645 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Chile and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.452 and weighted average of 20.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 139,671,707 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Mongolians and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.114 and weighted average of 20.2%, a difference of 0.32%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Chile | Mongolian |
| Minimum | 1.8% | 3.5% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 47.1% |
| Range | 98.2% | 43.6% |
| Mean | 25.7% | 19.9% |
| Median | 19.7% | 19.2% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 16.7% | 12.8% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 23.8% | 23.7% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.1% | 10.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 25.5% | 9.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 24.9% | 9.5% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Chile and Mongolians by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Chile are Brazilian (20.1%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from South Africa (20.1%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from South America (20.0%, a difference of 0.20%), Immigrants from Switzerland (20.0%, a difference of 0.24%), and South American (20.0%, a difference of 0.27%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Mongolians are Serbian (20.1%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Spain (20.2%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from South Africa (20.1%, a difference of 0.19%), Immigrants from Morocco (20.2%, a difference of 0.19%), and Immigrants from Hungary (20.2%, a difference of 0.21%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Immigrants | Northern Africa | 95.8 /100 | #115 | Exceptional 20.0% |
| Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 95.7 /100 | #116 | Exceptional 20.0% |
| Poles | 95.6 /100 | #117 | Exceptional 20.0% |
| Immigrants | Afghanistan | 95.4 /100 | #118 | Exceptional 20.0% |
| Immigrants | Ethiopia | 95.4 /100 | #119 | Exceptional 20.0% |
| South Americans | 95.1 /100 | #120 | Exceptional 20.0% |
| Immigrants | Switzerland | 95.1 /100 | #121 | Exceptional 20.0% |
| Immigrants | South America | 95.0 /100 | #122 | Exceptional 20.0% |
| Brazilians | 94.4 /100 | #123 | Exceptional 20.1% |
| Immigrants | Chile | 94.3 /100 | #124 | Exceptional 20.1% |
| Immigrants | South Africa | 93.9 /100 | #125 | Exceptional 20.1% |
| Serbians | 93.3 /100 | #126 | Exceptional 20.1% |
| Mongolians | 93.2 /100 | #127 | Exceptional 20.2% |
| Immigrants | Spain | 92.7 /100 | #128 | Exceptional 20.2% |
| Immigrants | Morocco | 92.4 /100 | #129 | Exceptional 20.2% |
| Immigrants | Hungary | 92.3 /100 | #130 | Exceptional 20.2% |
| Pakistanis | 92.1 /100 | #131 | Exceptional 20.2% |
| Uruguayans | 92.1 /100 | #132 | Exceptional 20.2% |
| Immigrants | England | 91.9 /100 | #133 | Exceptional 20.2% |
| Immigrants | Venezuela | 91.5 /100 | #134 | Exceptional 20.2% |
| Immigrants | Iraq | 91.2 /100 | #135 | Exceptional 20.2% |