Immigrants from Singapore vs Thai Married-Couple Family Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Singapore
Thai
Married-Couple Family Poverty
Married-Couple Family Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Singapore
Thais
4.1%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
22nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
3.9%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
8th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Singapore vs Thai Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 136,997,668 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Singapore and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.570 and weighted average of 4.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 469,612,983 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Thais and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.358 and weighted average of 3.9%, a difference of 4.5%.
Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Singapore | Thai |
| Minimum | 0.78% | 0.61% |
| Maximum | 20.5% | 10.8% |
| Range | 19.7% | 10.2% |
| Mean | 4.1% | 3.0% |
| Median | 3.6% | 2.8% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.6% | 2.1% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 5.4% | 3.7% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.8% | 1.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.0% | 1.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.0% | 1.5% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Singapore and Thais by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Singapore are Bhutanese (4.1%, a difference of 0.020%), Eastern European (4.1%, a difference of 0.26%), Zimbabwean (4.1%, a difference of 0.37%), Maltese (4.1%, a difference of 0.40%), and Immigrants from Ireland (4.1%, a difference of 0.64%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Thais are Croatian (3.9%, a difference of 0.44%), Carpatho Rusyn (3.9%, a difference of 0.49%), Latvian (3.9%, a difference of 0.54%), Lithuanian (4.0%, a difference of 1.0%), and Luxembourger (3.9%, a difference of 1.1%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
| Swedes | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 3.9% |
| Luxembourgers | 100.0 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 3.9% |
| Latvians | 100.0 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 3.9% |
| Thais | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 3.9% |
| Croatians | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 3.9% |
| Carpatho Rusyns | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 3.9% |
| Lithuanians | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 4.0% |
| Bulgarians | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 4.0% |
| Czechs | 100.0 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 4.0% |
| Slovaks | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 4.0% |
| Poles | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 4.0% |
| Germans | 100.0 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 4.0% |
| Filipinos | 100.0 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 4.0% |
| Italians | 100.0 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 4.0% |
| Immigrants | Ireland | 99.9 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 4.1% |
| Maltese | 99.9 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 4.1% |
| Zimbabweans | 99.9 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 4.1% |
| Immigrants | Singapore | 99.9 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 4.1% |
| Bhutanese | 99.9 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 4.1% |
| Eastern Europeans | 99.9 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 4.1% |
| Immigrants | Taiwan | 99.9 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 4.1% |