Immigrants from Oceania vs Uruguayan Male Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Oceania
Uruguayan
Male Poverty
Male Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Oceania
Uruguayans
11.2%
MALE POVERTY
50.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
174th/ 347
METRIC RANK
11.2%
MALE POVERTY
51.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
171st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Oceania vs Uruguayan Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 305,340,172 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Oceania and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.159 and weighted average of 11.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 144,748,239 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Uruguayans and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.181 and weighted average of 11.2%, a difference of 0.10%.
Male Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Oceania | Uruguayan |
| Minimum | 3.0% | 0.34% |
| Maximum | 23.0% | 25.8% |
| Range | 20.0% | 25.4% |
| Mean | 12.3% | 8.7% |
| Median | 12.1% | 9.5% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 9.3% | 3.9% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 14.2% | 11.0% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.9% | 7.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.8% | 5.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.8% | 5.5% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Oceania and Uruguayans by Male Poverty
In terms of male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Oceania are Pennsylvania German (11.2%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Ethiopia (11.2%, a difference of 0.070%), Celtic (11.2%, a difference of 0.25%), South American (11.1%, a difference of 0.37%), and Immigrants from Fiji (11.2%, a difference of 0.39%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Uruguayans are Immigrants from Ethiopia (11.2%, a difference of 0.040%), Pennsylvania German (11.2%, a difference of 0.060%), South American (11.1%, a difference of 0.27%), Immigrants from Colombia (11.1%, a difference of 0.31%), and Celtic (11.2%, a difference of 0.35%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Poverty |
| Immigrants | Chile | 57.4 /100 | #162 | Average 11.1% |
| Whites/Caucasians | 56.7 /100 | #163 | Average 11.1% |
| Ethiopians | 56.7 /100 | #164 | Average 11.1% |
| Immigrants | Spain | 55.5 /100 | #165 | Average 11.1% |
| Immigrants | Albania | 55.3 /100 | #166 | Average 11.1% |
| Hungarians | 55.1 /100 | #167 | Average 11.1% |
| Immigrants | Portugal | 54.9 /100 | #168 | Average 11.1% |
| Immigrants | Colombia | 54.2 /100 | #169 | Average 11.1% |
| South Americans | 53.8 /100 | #170 | Average 11.1% |
| Uruguayans | 51.0 /100 | #171 | Average 11.2% |
| Immigrants | Ethiopia | 50.7 /100 | #172 | Average 11.2% |
| Pennsylvania Germans | 50.5 /100 | #173 | Average 11.2% |
| Immigrants | Oceania | 50.0 /100 | #174 | Average 11.2% |
| Celtics | 47.5 /100 | #175 | Average 11.2% |
| Immigrants | Fiji | 46.0 /100 | #176 | Average 11.2% |
| Lebanese | 45.6 /100 | #177 | Average 11.2% |
| Immigrants | Cameroon | 44.5 /100 | #178 | Average 11.2% |
| Immigrants | Syria | 40.3 /100 | #179 | Average 11.3% |
| Immigrants | Morocco | 40.1 /100 | #180 | Average 11.3% |
| Immigrants | Costa Rica | 39.5 /100 | #181 | Fair 11.3% |
| Mongolians | 39.0 /100 | #182 | Fair 11.3% |