Immigrants from Norway vs Immigrants from Peru Male Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Norway
Immigrants from Peru
Male Poverty
Male Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Norway
Immigrants from Peru
10.7%
MALE POVERTY
86.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
125th/ 347
METRIC RANK
10.7%
MALE POVERTY
84.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
129th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Norway vs Immigrants from Peru Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 116,684,379 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Norway and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.476 and weighted average of 10.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 328,672,815 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Peru and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.135 and weighted average of 10.7%, a difference of 0.38%.
Male Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Norway | Immigrants from Peru |
Minimum | 0.44% | 0.066% |
Maximum | 58.1% | 29.7% |
Range | 57.6% | 29.6% |
Mean | 9.4% | 11.3% |
Median | 7.1% | 10.2% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.2% | 8.6% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 9.7% | 13.3% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.6% | 4.7% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 11.3% | 5.3% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 11.1% | 5.3% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Norway and Immigrants from Peru by Male Poverty
In terms of male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Norway are French (10.7%, a difference of 0.15%), South African (10.7%, a difference of 0.18%), Native Hawaiian (10.7%, a difference of 0.22%), Peruvian (10.7%, a difference of 0.23%), and Immigrants from China (10.7%, a difference of 0.25%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Peru are Immigrants from Western Europe (10.7%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Ukraine (10.7%, a difference of 0.030%), Puget Sound Salish (10.7%, a difference of 0.030%), Chilean (10.7%, a difference of 0.050%), and Immigrants from Belarus (10.7%, a difference of 0.15%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Poverty |
Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 88.1 /100 | #117 | Excellent 10.6% |
Okinawans | 87.6 /100 | #118 | Excellent 10.7% |
Immigrants | Hungary | 87.6 /100 | #119 | Excellent 10.7% |
Immigrants | China | 87.1 /100 | #120 | Excellent 10.7% |
Peruvians | 87.1 /100 | #121 | Excellent 10.7% |
Native Hawaiians | 87.0 /100 | #122 | Excellent 10.7% |
South Africans | 86.8 /100 | #123 | Excellent 10.7% |
French | 86.7 /100 | #124 | Excellent 10.7% |
Immigrants | Norway | 86.0 /100 | #125 | Excellent 10.7% |
Immigrants | Ukraine | 84.3 /100 | #126 | Excellent 10.7% |
Puget Sound Salish | 84.3 /100 | #127 | Excellent 10.7% |
Immigrants | Western Europe | 84.2 /100 | #128 | Excellent 10.7% |
Immigrants | Peru | 84.1 /100 | #129 | Excellent 10.7% |
Chileans | 83.9 /100 | #130 | Excellent 10.7% |
Immigrants | Belarus | 83.3 /100 | #131 | Excellent 10.7% |
Immigrants | Vietnam | 83.0 /100 | #132 | Excellent 10.8% |
Pakistanis | 83.0 /100 | #133 | Excellent 10.8% |
New Zealanders | 82.9 /100 | #134 | Excellent 10.8% |
Brazilians | 82.7 /100 | #135 | Excellent 10.8% |
Immigrants | Israel | 80.9 /100 | #136 | Excellent 10.8% |
Immigrants | Switzerland | 79.2 /100 | #137 | Good 10.8% |