Immigrants from Norway vs Immigrants from China Male Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Norway
Immigrants from China
Male Poverty
Male Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Norway
Immigrants from China
10.7%
MALE POVERTY
86.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
125th/ 347
METRIC RANK
10.7%
MALE POVERTY
87.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
120th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Norway vs Immigrants from China Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 116,684,379 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Norway and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.476 and weighted average of 10.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 456,181,421 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from China and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.295 and weighted average of 10.7%, a difference of 0.25%.
Male Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Norway | Immigrants from China |
| Minimum | 0.44% | 1.9% |
| Maximum | 58.1% | 24.3% |
| Range | 57.6% | 22.4% |
| Mean | 9.4% | 10.4% |
| Median | 7.1% | 9.8% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.2% | 7.9% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 9.7% | 11.4% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.6% | 3.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 11.3% | 3.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 11.1% | 3.7% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Norway and Immigrants from China by Male Poverty
In terms of male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Norway are French (10.7%, a difference of 0.15%), South African (10.7%, a difference of 0.18%), Native Hawaiian (10.7%, a difference of 0.22%), Peruvian (10.7%, a difference of 0.23%), and Okinawan (10.7%, a difference of 0.35%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from China are Peruvian (10.7%, a difference of 0.010%), Native Hawaiian (10.7%, a difference of 0.030%), South African (10.7%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Hungary (10.7%, a difference of 0.10%), and French (10.7%, a difference of 0.10%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Poverty |
| Immigrants | Turkey | 89.5 /100 | #112 | Excellent 10.6% |
| Palestinians | 89.1 /100 | #113 | Excellent 10.6% |
| Immigrants | Brazil | 89.0 /100 | #114 | Excellent 10.6% |
| Immigrants | Russia | 88.6 /100 | #115 | Excellent 10.6% |
| Sri Lankans | 88.1 /100 | #116 | Excellent 10.6% |
| Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 88.1 /100 | #117 | Excellent 10.6% |
| Okinawans | 87.6 /100 | #118 | Excellent 10.7% |
| Immigrants | Hungary | 87.6 /100 | #119 | Excellent 10.7% |
| Immigrants | China | 87.1 /100 | #120 | Excellent 10.7% |
| Peruvians | 87.1 /100 | #121 | Excellent 10.7% |
| Native Hawaiians | 87.0 /100 | #122 | Excellent 10.7% |
| South Africans | 86.8 /100 | #123 | Excellent 10.7% |
| French | 86.7 /100 | #124 | Excellent 10.7% |
| Immigrants | Norway | 86.0 /100 | #125 | Excellent 10.7% |
| Immigrants | Ukraine | 84.3 /100 | #126 | Excellent 10.7% |
| Puget Sound Salish | 84.3 /100 | #127 | Excellent 10.7% |
| Immigrants | Western Europe | 84.2 /100 | #128 | Excellent 10.7% |
| Immigrants | Peru | 84.1 /100 | #129 | Excellent 10.7% |
| Chileans | 83.9 /100 | #130 | Excellent 10.7% |
| Immigrants | Belarus | 83.3 /100 | #131 | Excellent 10.7% |
| Immigrants | Vietnam | 83.0 /100 | #132 | Excellent 10.8% |