Croatian vs Immigrants from Bolivia Male Poverty
COMPARE
Croatian
Immigrants from Bolivia
Male Poverty
Male Poverty Comparison
Croatians
Immigrants from Bolivia
9.6%
MALE POVERTY
99.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
22nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
9.4%
MALE POVERTY
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
12th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Croatian vs Immigrants from Bolivia Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 375,378,387 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Croatians and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.155 and weighted average of 9.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 158,688,041 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Bolivia and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.012 and weighted average of 9.4%, a difference of 2.4%.
Male Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Croatian | Immigrants from Bolivia |
| Minimum | 2.1% | 2.0% |
| Maximum | 25.5% | 22.9% |
| Range | 23.4% | 20.9% |
| Mean | 9.4% | 8.3% |
| Median | 8.2% | 7.3% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 6.5% | 5.9% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 11.6% | 10.1% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.2% | 4.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.4% | 4.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.4% | 4.2% |
Demographics Similar to Croatians and Immigrants from Bolivia by Male Poverty
In terms of male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Croatians are Italian (9.6%, a difference of 0.010%), Swedish (9.6%, a difference of 0.090%), Eastern European (9.6%, a difference of 0.23%), Immigrants from Scotland (9.6%, a difference of 0.25%), and Latvian (9.6%, a difference of 0.51%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Bolivia are Bolivian (9.4%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Lithuania (9.4%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from North Macedonia (9.4%, a difference of 0.50%), Bulgarian (9.3%, a difference of 0.69%), and Bhutanese (9.5%, a difference of 0.79%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Poverty |
| Immigrants | Ireland | 99.9 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 9.1% |
| Filipinos | 99.9 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 9.2% |
| Immigrants | South Central Asia | 99.9 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 9.3% |
| Bulgarians | 99.9 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 9.3% |
| Bolivians | 99.9 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 9.4% |
| Immigrants | Bolivia | 99.9 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 9.4% |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.9 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 9.4% |
| Immigrants | North Macedonia | 99.8 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 9.4% |
| Bhutanese | 99.8 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 9.5% |
| Luxembourgers | 99.8 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 9.5% |
| Norwegians | 99.8 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 9.5% |
| Lithuanians | 99.8 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 9.5% |
| Immigrants | Hong Kong | 99.7 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 9.6% |
| Latvians | 99.7 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 9.6% |
| Immigrants | Scotland | 99.7 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 9.6% |
| Croatians | 99.7 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 9.6% |
| Italians | 99.7 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 9.6% |
| Swedes | 99.7 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 9.6% |
| Eastern Europeans | 99.6 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 9.6% |
| Burmese | 99.6 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 9.7% |
| Danes | 99.6 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 9.7% |