Immigrants from North America vs Jordanian Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from North America
Jordanian
Poverty
Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from North America
Jordanians
11.3%
POVERTY
96.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
76th/ 347
METRIC RANK
11.4%
POVERTY
96.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
86th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from North America vs Jordanian Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 462,172,327 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from North America and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.645 and weighted average of 11.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 166,402,418 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Jordanians and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.240 and weighted average of 11.4%, a difference of 0.61%.

Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from North America | Jordanian |
Minimum | 3.8% | 2.5% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 21.3% |
Range | 96.2% | 18.7% |
Mean | 23.1% | 10.3% |
Median | 15.4% | 9.9% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 9.4% | 7.7% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 23.2% | 12.7% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 13.8% | 5.0% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 23.3% | 4.4% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 23.0% | 4.4% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from North America and Jordanians by Poverty
In terms of poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from North America are Immigrants from Eastern Asia (11.3%, a difference of 0.070%), Dutch (11.3%, a difference of 0.080%), Cambodian (11.3%, a difference of 0.13%), Indian (Asian) (11.3%, a difference of 0.14%), and Immigrants from Eastern Europe (11.3%, a difference of 0.15%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Jordanians are Northern European (11.4%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from England (11.4%, a difference of 0.12%), Belgian (11.4%, a difference of 0.14%), English (11.3%, a difference of 0.18%), and Czechoslovakian (11.4%, a difference of 0.18%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Poverty |
Zimbabweans | 97.3 /100 | #71 | Exceptional 11.3% |
Europeans | 97.2 /100 | #72 | Exceptional 11.3% |
Immigrants | Belgium | 97.2 /100 | #73 | Exceptional 11.3% |
Carpatho Rusyns | 97.2 /100 | #74 | Exceptional 11.3% |
Immigrants | Eastern Europe | 97.0 /100 | #75 | Exceptional 11.3% |
Immigrants | North America | 96.8 /100 | #76 | Exceptional 11.3% |
Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 96.7 /100 | #77 | Exceptional 11.3% |
Dutch | 96.7 /100 | #78 | Exceptional 11.3% |
Cambodians | 96.7 /100 | #79 | Exceptional 11.3% |
Indians (Asian) | 96.6 /100 | #80 | Exceptional 11.3% |
Irish | 96.6 /100 | #81 | Exceptional 11.3% |
Egyptians | 96.5 /100 | #82 | Exceptional 11.3% |
Immigrants | Sweden | 96.3 /100 | #83 | Exceptional 11.3% |
English | 96.3 /100 | #84 | Exceptional 11.3% |
Immigrants | England | 96.2 /100 | #85 | Exceptional 11.4% |
Jordanians | 96.0 /100 | #86 | Exceptional 11.4% |
Northern Europeans | 96.0 /100 | #87 | Exceptional 11.4% |
Belgians | 95.8 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 11.4% |
Czechoslovakians | 95.7 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 11.4% |
Immigrants | Denmark | 95.5 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 11.4% |
Finns | 95.2 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 11.4% |