Immigrants from South Africa vs Jordanian Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from South Africa
Jordanian
Poverty
Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from South Africa
Jordanians
11.5%
POVERTY
94.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
96th/ 347
METRIC RANK
11.4%
POVERTY
96.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
86th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from South Africa vs Jordanian Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 233,262,094 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from South Africa and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.826 and weighted average of 11.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 166,402,418 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Jordanians and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.240 and weighted average of 11.4%, a difference of 0.80%.
Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from South Africa | Jordanian |
| Minimum | 1.2% | 2.5% |
| Maximum | 54.5% | 21.3% |
| Range | 53.4% | 18.7% |
| Mean | 11.8% | 10.3% |
| Median | 9.3% | 9.9% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 7.5% | 7.7% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 13.4% | 12.7% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.9% | 5.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 10.2% | 4.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 10.0% | 4.4% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from South Africa and Jordanians by Poverty
In terms of poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from South Africa are Immigrants from Egypt (11.5%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Latvia (11.5%, a difference of 0.070%), Paraguayan (11.4%, a difference of 0.12%), Australian (11.4%, a difference of 0.12%), and Romanian (11.4%, a difference of 0.14%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Jordanians are Northern European (11.4%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from England (11.4%, a difference of 0.12%), Belgian (11.4%, a difference of 0.14%), English (11.3%, a difference of 0.18%), and Czechoslovakian (11.4%, a difference of 0.18%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Poverty |
| Irish | 96.6 /100 | #81 | Exceptional 11.3% |
| Egyptians | 96.5 /100 | #82 | Exceptional 11.3% |
| Immigrants | Sweden | 96.3 /100 | #83 | Exceptional 11.3% |
| English | 96.3 /100 | #84 | Exceptional 11.3% |
| Immigrants | England | 96.2 /100 | #85 | Exceptional 11.4% |
| Jordanians | 96.0 /100 | #86 | Exceptional 11.4% |
| Northern Europeans | 96.0 /100 | #87 | Exceptional 11.4% |
| Belgians | 95.8 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 11.4% |
| Czechoslovakians | 95.7 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 11.4% |
| Immigrants | Denmark | 95.5 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 11.4% |
| Finns | 95.2 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 11.4% |
| British | 95.0 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 11.4% |
| Romanians | 94.9 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 11.4% |
| Paraguayans | 94.9 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 11.4% |
| Australians | 94.9 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 11.4% |
| Immigrants | South Africa | 94.7 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 11.5% |
| Immigrants | Egypt | 94.6 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 11.5% |
| Immigrants | Latvia | 94.5 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 11.5% |
| Immigrants | Indonesia | 94.2 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 11.5% |
| Scottish | 94.0 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 11.5% |
| Slavs | 93.3 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 11.5% |