Immigrants from Korea vs Bolivian Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Korea
Bolivian
Poverty
Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Korea
Bolivians
10.7%
POVERTY
99.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
28th/ 347
METRIC RANK
10.4%
POVERTY
99.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
15th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Korea vs Bolivian Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 415,974,452 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Korea and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.341 and weighted average of 10.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 184,629,688 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Bolivians and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.083 and weighted average of 10.4%, a difference of 2.6%.
Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Korea | Bolivian |
Minimum | 1.6% | 0.58% |
Maximum | 37.7% | 33.0% |
Range | 36.1% | 32.4% |
Mean | 10.0% | 9.4% |
Median | 8.9% | 8.5% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.9% | 6.4% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 11.7% | 10.6% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.7% | 4.2% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 7.0% | 5.6% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.9% | 5.6% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Korea and Bolivians by Poverty
In terms of poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Korea are Immigrants from Northern Europe (10.7%, a difference of 0.070%), Greek (10.7%, a difference of 0.090%), Danish (10.7%, a difference of 0.10%), Polish (10.7%, a difference of 0.19%), and Burmese (10.7%, a difference of 0.42%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Bolivians are Immigrants from Bolivia (10.4%, a difference of 0.010%), Lithuanian (10.5%, a difference of 0.30%), Immigrants from Hong Kong (10.4%, a difference of 0.32%), Bhutanese (10.4%, a difference of 0.54%), and Norwegian (10.5%, a difference of 0.67%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Poverty |
Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.9 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 10.3% |
Bhutanese | 99.8 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 10.4% |
Immigrants | Hong Kong | 99.8 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 10.4% |
Immigrants | Bolivia | 99.8 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 10.4% |
Bolivians | 99.8 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 10.4% |
Lithuanians | 99.8 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 10.5% |
Norwegians | 99.8 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 10.5% |
Latvians | 99.8 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 10.5% |
Immigrants | Scotland | 99.7 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 10.6% |
Immigrants | North Macedonia | 99.7 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 10.6% |
Luxembourgers | 99.7 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 10.6% |
Eastern Europeans | 99.7 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 10.6% |
Swedes | 99.7 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 10.6% |
Italians | 99.7 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 10.6% |
Croatians | 99.6 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 10.6% |
Burmese | 99.6 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 10.7% |
Immigrants | Northern Europe | 99.6 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 10.7% |
Immigrants | Korea | 99.5 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 10.7% |
Greeks | 99.5 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 10.7% |
Danes | 99.5 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 10.7% |
Poles | 99.5 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 10.7% |