Immigrants from Indonesia vs Czechoslovakian Male Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Indonesia
Czechoslovakian
Male Poverty
Male Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Indonesia
Czechoslovakians
10.5%
MALE POVERTY
93.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
99th/ 347
METRIC RANK
10.3%
MALE POVERTY
95.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
84th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Indonesia vs Czechoslovakian Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 215,697,022 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Indonesia and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.416 and weighted average of 10.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 368,409,681 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Czechoslovakians and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.247 and weighted average of 10.3%, a difference of 1.2%.
Male Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Indonesia | Czechoslovakian |
| Minimum | 0.89% | 0.22% |
| Maximum | 30.3% | 37.0% |
| Range | 29.4% | 36.8% |
| Mean | 9.9% | 12.4% |
| Median | 9.2% | 11.3% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 6.8% | 8.4% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 10.5% | 16.1% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.7% | 7.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.4% | 7.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.3% | 7.4% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Indonesia and Czechoslovakians by Male Poverty
In terms of male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Indonesia are Finnish (10.5%, a difference of 0.060%), Romanian (10.5%, a difference of 0.13%), Immigrants from Egypt (10.4%, a difference of 0.18%), Immigrants from Latvia (10.5%, a difference of 0.21%), and Scottish (10.4%, a difference of 0.31%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Czechoslovakians are Immigrants from England (10.4%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Sweden (10.3%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Eastern Asia (10.4%, a difference of 0.18%), Belgian (10.3%, a difference of 0.19%), and Egyptian (10.3%, a difference of 0.19%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Poverty |
| Belgians | 95.9 /100 | #81 | Exceptional 10.3% |
| Egyptians | 95.9 /100 | #82 | Exceptional 10.3% |
| Immigrants | Sweden | 95.7 /100 | #83 | Exceptional 10.3% |
| Czechoslovakians | 95.6 /100 | #84 | Exceptional 10.3% |
| Immigrants | England | 95.5 /100 | #85 | Exceptional 10.4% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 95.3 /100 | #86 | Exceptional 10.4% |
| Northern Europeans | 95.2 /100 | #87 | Exceptional 10.4% |
| Cambodians | 95.0 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 10.4% |
| Immigrants | Denmark | 95.0 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 10.4% |
| Indians (Asian) | 94.9 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 10.4% |
| British | 94.8 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 10.4% |
| Jordanians | 94.4 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 10.4% |
| Australians | 94.4 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 10.4% |
| Immigrants | South Africa | 94.1 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 10.4% |
| Scottish | 94.0 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 10.4% |
| Immigrants | Egypt | 93.7 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 10.4% |
| Romanians | 93.6 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 10.5% |
| Finns | 93.4 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 10.5% |
| Immigrants | Indonesia | 93.3 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 10.5% |
| Immigrants | Latvia | 92.8 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 10.5% |
| Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 92.0 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 10.5% |