Indian (Asian) vs Czechoslovakian Male Poverty
COMPARE
Indian (Asian)
Czechoslovakian
Male Poverty
Male Poverty Comparison
Indians (Asian)
Czechoslovakians
10.4%
MALE POVERTY
94.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
90th/ 347
METRIC RANK
10.3%
MALE POVERTY
95.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
84th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Indian (Asian) vs Czechoslovakian Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 494,421,628 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Indians (Asian) and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.161 and weighted average of 10.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 368,409,681 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Czechoslovakians and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.247 and weighted average of 10.3%, a difference of 0.38%.
Male Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Indian (Asian) | Czechoslovakian |
| Minimum | 1.3% | 0.22% |
| Maximum | 19.1% | 37.0% |
| Range | 17.7% | 36.8% |
| Mean | 9.6% | 12.4% |
| Median | 9.5% | 11.3% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 7.7% | 8.4% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 11.1% | 16.1% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.5% | 7.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.2% | 7.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.2% | 7.4% |
Demographics Similar to Indians (Asian) and Czechoslovakians by Male Poverty
In terms of male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Indians (Asian) are Immigrants from Denmark (10.4%, a difference of 0.020%), Cambodian (10.4%, a difference of 0.030%), British (10.4%, a difference of 0.070%), Northern European (10.4%, a difference of 0.17%), and Immigrants from Eastern Asia (10.4%, a difference of 0.20%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Czechoslovakians are Immigrants from England (10.4%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Sweden (10.3%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Eastern Asia (10.4%, a difference of 0.18%), Belgian (10.3%, a difference of 0.19%), and Egyptian (10.3%, a difference of 0.19%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Poverty |
| Immigrants | Belgium | 96.8 /100 | #77 | Exceptional 10.3% |
| Irish | 96.8 /100 | #78 | Exceptional 10.3% |
| Immigrants | North America | 96.5 /100 | #79 | Exceptional 10.3% |
| English | 96.4 /100 | #80 | Exceptional 10.3% |
| Belgians | 95.9 /100 | #81 | Exceptional 10.3% |
| Egyptians | 95.9 /100 | #82 | Exceptional 10.3% |
| Immigrants | Sweden | 95.7 /100 | #83 | Exceptional 10.3% |
| Czechoslovakians | 95.6 /100 | #84 | Exceptional 10.3% |
| Immigrants | England | 95.5 /100 | #85 | Exceptional 10.4% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 95.3 /100 | #86 | Exceptional 10.4% |
| Northern Europeans | 95.2 /100 | #87 | Exceptional 10.4% |
| Cambodians | 95.0 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 10.4% |
| Immigrants | Denmark | 95.0 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 10.4% |
| Indians (Asian) | 94.9 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 10.4% |
| British | 94.8 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 10.4% |
| Jordanians | 94.4 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 10.4% |
| Australians | 94.4 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 10.4% |
| Immigrants | South Africa | 94.1 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 10.4% |
| Scottish | 94.0 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 10.4% |
| Immigrants | Egypt | 93.7 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 10.4% |
| Romanians | 93.6 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 10.5% |