Immigrants from Eritrea vs Panamanian Female Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Eritrea
 Panamanian
 Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Eritrea
Panamanians
14.6%
FEMALE POVERTY
2.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
226th/ 347
METRIC RANK
14.2%
FEMALE POVERTY
7.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
209th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Eritrea vs Panamanian Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 104,846,826 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Eritrea and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.339 and weighted average of 14.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 281,053,413 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Panamanians and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.443 and weighted average of 14.2%, a difference of 2.8%.
 
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Eritrea | Panamanian | 
| Minimum | 1.0% | 1.9% | 
| Maximum | 45.6% | 64.6% | 
| Range | 44.6% | 62.7% | 
| Mean | 15.0% | 14.4% | 
| Median | 13.6% | 12.9% | 
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 10.3% | 9.2% | 
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 17.2% | 17.0% | 
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.9% | 7.8% | 
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 8.9% | 10.8% | 
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 8.8% | 10.7% | 
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Eritrea and Panamanians by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Eritrea are Immigrants from Nigeria (14.7%, a difference of 0.31%), American (14.6%, a difference of 0.33%), Immigrants from Micronesia (14.6%, a difference of 0.33%), Immigrants from Africa (14.5%, a difference of 0.73%), and Nonimmigrants (14.5%, a difference of 0.96%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Panamanians are Immigrants from the Azores (14.2%, a difference of 0.060%), Malaysian (14.3%, a difference of 0.080%), Moroccan (14.3%, a difference of 0.17%), Immigrants from Eastern Africa (14.2%, a difference of 0.41%), and Bermudan (14.4%, a difference of 0.80%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty | 
| Immigrants | Eastern Africa | 9.0 /100 | #207  | Tragic 14.2%  | 
| Immigrants | Azores | 7.9 /100 | #208  | Tragic 14.2%  | 
| Panamanians | 7.7 /100 | #209  | Tragic 14.2%  | 
| Malaysians | 7.4 /100 | #210  | Tragic 14.3%  | 
| Moroccans | 7.2 /100 | #211  | Tragic 14.3%  | 
| Bermudans | 5.5 /100 | #212  | Tragic 14.4%  | 
| Alaskan Athabascans | 5.3 /100 | #213  | Tragic 14.4%  | 
| Marshallese | 5.0 /100 | #214  | Tragic 14.4%  | 
| Immigrants | Panama | 4.7 /100 | #215  | Tragic 14.4%  | 
| Immigrants | Thailand | 4.5 /100 | #216  | Tragic 14.4%  | 
| Immigrants | Immigrants | 4.5 /100 | #217  | Tragic 14.4%  | 
| Immigrants | Uzbekistan | 4.4 /100 | #218  | Tragic 14.4%  | 
| Japanese | 4.1 /100 | #219  | Tragic 14.5%  | 
| Alsatians | 4.0 /100 | #220  | Tragic 14.5%  | 
| Immigrants | Cambodia | 3.7 /100 | #221  | Tragic 14.5%  | 
| Immigrants | Nonimmigrants | 3.7 /100 | #222  | Tragic 14.5%  | 
| Immigrants | Africa | 3.3 /100 | #223  | Tragic 14.5%  | 
| Americans | 2.8 /100 | #224  | Tragic 14.6%  | 
| Immigrants | Micronesia | 2.8 /100 | #225  | Tragic 14.6%  | 
| Immigrants | Eritrea | 2.4 /100 | #226  | Tragic 14.6%  | 
| Immigrants | Nigeria | 2.1 /100 | #227  | Tragic 14.7%  |