Immigrants from Cuba vs Turkish Single Male Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Cuba
Turkish
Single Male Poverty
Single Male Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Cuba
Turks
12.2%
SINGLE MALE POVERTY
97.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
99th/ 347
METRIC RANK
12.1%
SINGLE MALE POVERTY
98.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
85th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Cuba vs Turkish Single Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 295,328,231 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Cuba and poverty level among single males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.157 and weighted average of 12.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 244,728,482 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Turks and poverty level among single males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.490 and weighted average of 12.1%, a difference of 0.82%.
Single Male Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Cuba | Turkish |
| Minimum | 0.49% | 3.3% |
| Maximum | 41.8% | 62.2% |
| Range | 41.3% | 58.9% |
| Mean | 12.3% | 18.2% |
| Median | 11.8% | 13.8% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 7.7% | 11.4% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 14.3% | 19.6% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.6% | 8.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 7.0% | 13.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 7.0% | 12.8% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Cuba and Turks by Single Male Poverty
In terms of single male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Cuba are Immigrants from Italy (12.2%, a difference of 0.040%), Guamanian/Chamorro (12.2%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Sweden (12.2%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Australia (12.2%, a difference of 0.11%), and Immigrants from Latvia (12.2%, a difference of 0.15%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Turks are Immigrants from Israel (12.1%, a difference of 0.020%), South American (12.1%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Eritrea (12.1%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Czechoslovakia (12.1%, a difference of 0.080%), and Immigrants from Colombia (12.1%, a difference of 0.10%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Male Poverty |
| Immigrants | Colombia | 98.6 /100 | #82 | Exceptional 12.1% |
| Immigrants | Chile | 98.6 /100 | #83 | Exceptional 12.1% |
| Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 98.6 /100 | #84 | Exceptional 12.1% |
| Turks | 98.5 /100 | #85 | Exceptional 12.1% |
| Immigrants | Israel | 98.5 /100 | #86 | Exceptional 12.1% |
| South Americans | 98.5 /100 | #87 | Exceptional 12.1% |
| Immigrants | Eritrea | 98.5 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 12.1% |
| Immigrants | Ireland | 98.3 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 12.1% |
| South American Indians | 98.3 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 12.1% |
| Immigrants | Turkey | 98.2 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 12.1% |
| Spanish American Indians | 98.0 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 12.1% |
| Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 97.9 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 12.1% |
| Colombians | 97.8 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 12.2% |
| Mongolians | 97.7 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 12.2% |
| Immigrants | Sweden | 97.5 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 12.2% |
| Immigrants | Italy | 97.4 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 12.2% |
| Guamanians/Chamorros | 97.4 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 12.2% |
| Immigrants | Cuba | 97.3 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 12.2% |
| Immigrants | Australia | 97.1 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 12.2% |
| Immigrants | Latvia | 97.0 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 12.2% |
| Immigrants | Europe | 97.0 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 12.2% |