Laotian vs Turkish Single Male Poverty
COMPARE
Laotian
Turkish
Single Male Poverty
Single Male Poverty Comparison
Laotians
Turks
11.9%
SINGLE MALE POVERTY
99.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
65th/ 347
METRIC RANK
12.1%
SINGLE MALE POVERTY
98.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
85th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Laotian vs Turkish Single Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 207,953,623 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Laotians and poverty level among single males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.684 and weighted average of 11.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 244,728,482 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Turks and poverty level among single males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.490 and weighted average of 12.1%, a difference of 2.0%.
Single Male Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Laotian | Turkish |
| Minimum | 3.9% | 3.3% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 62.2% |
| Range | 96.1% | 58.9% |
| Mean | 31.9% | 18.2% |
| Median | 14.3% | 13.8% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 11.0% | 11.4% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 50.7% | 19.6% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 39.7% | 8.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 32.6% | 13.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 32.0% | 12.8% |
Demographics Similar to Laotians and Turks by Single Male Poverty
In terms of single male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Laotians are Immigrants from Uruguay (11.9%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Ukraine (11.9%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Croatia (11.9%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Russia (11.9%, a difference of 0.060%), and Immigrants from Nepal (11.9%, a difference of 0.080%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Turks are Immigrants from Czechoslovakia (12.1%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Colombia (12.1%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Chile (12.1%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from South America (12.1%, a difference of 0.16%), and Armenian (12.1%, a difference of 0.18%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Male Poverty |
| Laotians | 99.6 /100 | #65 | Exceptional 11.9% |
| Immigrants | Uruguay | 99.6 /100 | #66 | Exceptional 11.9% |
| Immigrants | Ukraine | 99.6 /100 | #67 | Exceptional 11.9% |
| Immigrants | Croatia | 99.6 /100 | #68 | Exceptional 11.9% |
| Immigrants | Russia | 99.6 /100 | #69 | Exceptional 11.9% |
| Immigrants | Nepal | 99.6 /100 | #70 | Exceptional 11.9% |
| Immigrants | Greece | 99.6 /100 | #71 | Exceptional 11.9% |
| Immigrants | Argentina | 99.5 /100 | #72 | Exceptional 11.9% |
| Argentineans | 99.5 /100 | #73 | Exceptional 11.9% |
| Chileans | 99.5 /100 | #74 | Exceptional 11.9% |
| Uruguayans | 99.4 /100 | #75 | Exceptional 11.9% |
| Immigrants | Northern Africa | 99.4 /100 | #76 | Exceptional 11.9% |
| Immigrants | Malaysia | 99.2 /100 | #77 | Exceptional 12.0% |
| Immigrants | Venezuela | 99.1 /100 | #78 | Exceptional 12.0% |
| Immigrants | Belgium | 99.0 /100 | #79 | Exceptional 12.0% |
| Armenians | 98.7 /100 | #80 | Exceptional 12.1% |
| Immigrants | South America | 98.7 /100 | #81 | Exceptional 12.1% |
| Immigrants | Colombia | 98.6 /100 | #82 | Exceptional 12.1% |
| Immigrants | Chile | 98.6 /100 | #83 | Exceptional 12.1% |
| Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 98.6 /100 | #84 | Exceptional 12.1% |
| Turks | 98.5 /100 | #85 | Exceptional 12.1% |