Hungarian vs South American Male Poverty
COMPARE
Hungarian
South American
Male Poverty
Male Poverty Comparison
Hungarians
South Americans
11.1%
MALE POVERTY
55.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
167th/ 347
METRIC RANK
11.1%
MALE POVERTY
53.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
170th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Hungarian vs South American Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 485,483,073 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Hungarians and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.495 and weighted average of 11.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 493,234,153 people shows no correlation between the proportion of South Americans and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.040 and weighted average of 11.1%, a difference of 0.14%.

Male Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Hungarian | South American |
Minimum | 1.2% | 1.0% |
Maximum | 67.8% | 22.6% |
Range | 66.6% | 21.6% |
Mean | 17.3% | 10.8% |
Median | 10.1% | 10.6% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 7.8% | 8.9% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 23.3% | 12.5% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 15.4% | 3.6% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 15.4% | 3.2% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 15.3% | 3.2% |
Demographics Similar to Hungarians and South Americans by Male Poverty
In terms of male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Hungarians are Immigrants from Albania (11.1%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Portugal (11.1%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Spain (11.1%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Colombia (11.1%, a difference of 0.090%), and White/Caucasian (11.1%, a difference of 0.16%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to South Americans are Immigrants from Colombia (11.1%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Portugal (11.1%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Albania (11.1%, a difference of 0.15%), Immigrants from Spain (11.1%, a difference of 0.18%), and Uruguayan (11.2%, a difference of 0.27%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Poverty |
Colombians | 63.0 /100 | #158 | Good 11.0% |
Taiwanese | 62.7 /100 | #159 | Good 11.0% |
Soviet Union | 60.3 /100 | #160 | Good 11.1% |
Immigrants | Northern Africa | 59.7 /100 | #161 | Average 11.1% |
Immigrants | Chile | 57.4 /100 | #162 | Average 11.1% |
Whites/Caucasians | 56.7 /100 | #163 | Average 11.1% |
Ethiopians | 56.7 /100 | #164 | Average 11.1% |
Immigrants | Spain | 55.5 /100 | #165 | Average 11.1% |
Immigrants | Albania | 55.3 /100 | #166 | Average 11.1% |
Hungarians | 55.1 /100 | #167 | Average 11.1% |
Immigrants | Portugal | 54.9 /100 | #168 | Average 11.1% |
Immigrants | Colombia | 54.2 /100 | #169 | Average 11.1% |
South Americans | 53.8 /100 | #170 | Average 11.1% |
Uruguayans | 51.0 /100 | #171 | Average 11.2% |
Immigrants | Ethiopia | 50.7 /100 | #172 | Average 11.2% |
Pennsylvania Germans | 50.5 /100 | #173 | Average 11.2% |
Immigrants | Oceania | 50.0 /100 | #174 | Average 11.2% |
Celtics | 47.5 /100 | #175 | Average 11.2% |
Immigrants | Fiji | 46.0 /100 | #176 | Average 11.2% |
Lebanese | 45.6 /100 | #177 | Average 11.2% |
Immigrants | Cameroon | 44.5 /100 | #178 | Average 11.2% |