Houma vs Chippewa Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
COMPARE
Houma
Chippewa
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Comparison
Houma
Chippewa
21.5%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
308th/ 347
METRIC RANK
20.6%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
291st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Houma vs Chippewa Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 36,699,840 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Houma and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.363 and weighted average of 21.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 212,813,465 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Chippewa and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.439 and weighted average of 20.6%, a difference of 4.1%.

Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Houma | Chippewa |
Minimum | 3.6% | 7.5% |
Maximum | 37.1% | 100.0% |
Range | 33.5% | 92.5% |
Mean | 19.0% | 37.7% |
Median | 20.6% | 27.8% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 11.5% | 18.9% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 26.5% | 56.3% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 15.0% | 37.5% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 9.5% | 25.5% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 9.3% | 25.4% |
Demographics Similar to Houma and Chippewa by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Houma are Bahamian (21.5%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Bahamas (21.4%, a difference of 0.18%), Immigrants from Central America (21.4%, a difference of 0.19%), Guatemalan (21.4%, a difference of 0.36%), and Indonesian (21.3%, a difference of 0.98%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Chippewa are Immigrants from Latin America (20.6%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Grenada (20.7%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Haiti (20.6%, a difference of 0.13%), Immigrants from Belize (20.6%, a difference of 0.20%), and Immigrants from Senegal (20.7%, a difference of 0.22%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
Immigrants | Belize | 0.0 /100 | #289 | Tragic 20.6% |
Immigrants | Haiti | 0.0 /100 | #290 | Tragic 20.6% |
Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #291 | Tragic 20.6% |
Immigrants | Latin America | 0.0 /100 | #292 | Tragic 20.6% |
Immigrants | Grenada | 0.0 /100 | #293 | Tragic 20.7% |
Immigrants | Senegal | 0.0 /100 | #294 | Tragic 20.7% |
Immigrants | Caribbean | 0.0 /100 | #295 | Tragic 20.7% |
Immigrants | West Indies | 0.0 /100 | #296 | Tragic 20.7% |
Inupiat | 0.0 /100 | #297 | Tragic 20.8% |
Mexicans | 0.0 /100 | #298 | Tragic 20.9% |
Hispanics or Latinos | 0.0 /100 | #299 | Tragic 21.0% |
Somalis | 0.0 /100 | #300 | Tragic 21.0% |
Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #301 | Tragic 21.1% |
Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #302 | Tragic 21.2% |
British West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #303 | Tragic 21.3% |
Indonesians | 0.0 /100 | #304 | Tragic 21.3% |
Guatemalans | 0.0 /100 | #305 | Tragic 21.4% |
Immigrants | Central America | 0.0 /100 | #306 | Tragic 21.4% |
Immigrants | Bahamas | 0.0 /100 | #307 | Tragic 21.4% |
Houma | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 21.5% |
Bahamians | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 21.5% |