Houma vs Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
COMPARE
Houma
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Comparison
Houma
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia
21.5%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
308th/ 347
METRIC RANK
14.2%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
99.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
47th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Houma vs Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 36,699,840 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Houma and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.363 and weighted average of 21.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 192,771,534 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.371 and weighted average of 14.2%, a difference of 51.8%.
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Houma | Immigrants from Czechoslovakia |
Minimum | 3.6% | 0.88% |
Maximum | 37.1% | 52.8% |
Range | 33.5% | 51.9% |
Mean | 19.0% | 18.9% |
Median | 20.6% | 14.4% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 11.5% | 10.3% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 26.5% | 22.7% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 15.0% | 12.4% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 9.5% | 12.4% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 9.3% | 12.2% |
Similar Demographics by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Demographics Similar to Houma by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Houma are Bahamian (21.5%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Bahamas (21.4%, a difference of 0.18%), Immigrants from Central America (21.4%, a difference of 0.19%), Guatemalan (21.4%, a difference of 0.36%), and Immigrants from Somalia (21.6%, a difference of 0.39%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #301 | Tragic 21.1% |
Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #302 | Tragic 21.2% |
British West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #303 | Tragic 21.3% |
Indonesians | 0.0 /100 | #304 | Tragic 21.3% |
Guatemalans | 0.0 /100 | #305 | Tragic 21.4% |
Immigrants | Central America | 0.0 /100 | #306 | Tragic 21.4% |
Immigrants | Bahamas | 0.0 /100 | #307 | Tragic 21.4% |
Houma | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 21.5% |
Bahamians | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 21.5% |
Immigrants | Somalia | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 21.6% |
Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 21.6% |
Immigrants | Mexico | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 21.6% |
Creek | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 21.7% |
Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 21.7% |
Ute | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 21.8% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Czechoslovakia by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Czechoslovakia are Czech (14.2%, a difference of 0.020%), Croatian (14.1%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Greece (14.1%, a difference of 0.060%), Greek (14.2%, a difference of 0.060%), and Immigrants from Israel (14.2%, a difference of 0.12%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 99.5 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 14.0% |
Immigrants | Bolivia | 99.5 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 14.0% |
Immigrants | Scotland | 99.4 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 14.0% |
Koreans | 99.4 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 14.1% |
Immigrants | Asia | 99.4 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 14.1% |
Immigrants | Greece | 99.3 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 14.1% |
Croatians | 99.3 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 14.1% |
Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 99.3 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 14.2% |
Czechs | 99.3 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 14.2% |
Greeks | 99.2 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 14.2% |
Immigrants | Israel | 99.2 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 14.2% |
Immigrants | Pakistan | 99.1 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 14.2% |
Italians | 99.1 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 14.3% |
Luxembourgers | 99.0 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 14.3% |
Estonians | 98.9 /100 | #54 | Exceptional 14.3% |