Hopi vs South American Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
COMPARE
Hopi
South American
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Comparison
Hopi
South Americans
27.9%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
341st/ 347
METRIC RANK
16.1%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
67.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
166th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Hopi vs South American Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 74,572,915 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Hopi and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.207 and weighted average of 27.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 481,449,574 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of South Americans and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.169 and weighted average of 16.1%, a difference of 72.7%.
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Hopi | South American |
| Minimum | 2.1% | 0.69% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 34.5% |
| Range | 97.9% | 33.8% |
| Mean | 38.3% | 15.2% |
| Median | 27.2% | 15.1% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 22.8% | 11.7% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 55.8% | 17.9% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 33.0% | 6.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 25.3% | 5.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 24.7% | 5.7% |
Similar Demographics by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Demographics Similar to Hopi by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Hopi are Pima (28.2%, a difference of 1.3%), Yuman (27.1%, a difference of 2.9%), Crow (26.4%, a difference of 5.7%), Immigrants from Yemen (29.5%, a difference of 5.9%), and Cheyenne (26.3%, a difference of 6.0%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
| Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 24.7% |
| Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 25.0% |
| Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 25.2% |
| Sioux | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 25.6% |
| Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 25.8% |
| Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 26.3% |
| Crow | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 26.4% |
| Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 27.1% |
| Hopi | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 27.9% |
| Pima | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 28.2% |
| Immigrants | Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 29.5% |
| Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 30.5% |
| Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 30.7% |
| Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 31.6% |
| Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #347 | Tragic 32.7% |
Demographics Similar to South Americans by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to South Americans are Immigrants from Germany (16.1%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Colombia (16.1%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Oceania (16.1%, a difference of 0.16%), French Canadian (16.1%, a difference of 0.21%), and Uruguayan (16.2%, a difference of 0.32%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
| Slovaks | 75.2 /100 | #159 | Good 15.9% |
| French | 72.8 /100 | #160 | Good 16.0% |
| Immigrants | Northern Africa | 72.0 /100 | #161 | Good 16.0% |
| French Canadians | 68.7 /100 | #162 | Good 16.1% |
| Immigrants | Oceania | 68.4 /100 | #163 | Good 16.1% |
| Immigrants | Colombia | 67.8 /100 | #164 | Good 16.1% |
| Immigrants | Germany | 67.3 /100 | #165 | Good 16.1% |
| South Americans | 67.2 /100 | #166 | Good 16.1% |
| Uruguayans | 64.7 /100 | #167 | Good 16.2% |
| Yugoslavians | 64.4 /100 | #168 | Good 16.2% |
| Costa Ricans | 64.2 /100 | #169 | Good 16.2% |
| Immigrants | Venezuela | 64.2 /100 | #170 | Good 16.2% |
| Immigrants | Saudi Arabia | 64.0 /100 | #171 | Good 16.2% |
| Afghans | 62.3 /100 | #172 | Good 16.2% |
| Immigrants | South America | 55.1 /100 | #173 | Average 16.4% |