Slovak vs South American Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
COMPARE
Slovak
South American
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Comparison
Slovaks
South Americans
15.9%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
75.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
159th/ 347
METRIC RANK
16.1%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
67.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
166th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Slovak vs South American Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 387,555,709 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Slovaks and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.558 and weighted average of 15.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 481,449,574 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of South Americans and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.169 and weighted average of 16.1%, a difference of 1.2%.
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Slovak | South American |
| Minimum | 4.0% | 0.69% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 34.5% |
| Range | 96.0% | 33.8% |
| Mean | 26.8% | 15.2% |
| Median | 18.8% | 15.1% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 14.4% | 11.7% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 29.6% | 17.9% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 15.2% | 6.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 21.7% | 5.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 21.5% | 5.7% |
Demographics Similar to Slovaks and South Americans by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Slovaks are Guamanian/Chamorro (15.9%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Fiji (15.9%, a difference of 0.13%), Colombian (15.9%, a difference of 0.13%), Syrian (15.9%, a difference of 0.23%), and Immigrants from Chile (15.9%, a difference of 0.24%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to South Americans are Immigrants from Germany (16.1%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Colombia (16.1%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Oceania (16.1%, a difference of 0.16%), French Canadian (16.1%, a difference of 0.21%), and Uruguayan (16.2%, a difference of 0.32%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
| Immigrants | Kuwait | 79.4 /100 | #152 | Good 15.8% |
| Immigrants | Nepal | 78.5 /100 | #153 | Good 15.9% |
| Immigrants | Chile | 76.7 /100 | #154 | Good 15.9% |
| Syrians | 76.7 /100 | #155 | Good 15.9% |
| Immigrants | Fiji | 76.1 /100 | #156 | Good 15.9% |
| Colombians | 76.1 /100 | #157 | Good 15.9% |
| Guamanians/Chamorros | 75.3 /100 | #158 | Good 15.9% |
| Slovaks | 75.2 /100 | #159 | Good 15.9% |
| French | 72.8 /100 | #160 | Good 16.0% |
| Immigrants | Northern Africa | 72.0 /100 | #161 | Good 16.0% |
| French Canadians | 68.7 /100 | #162 | Good 16.1% |
| Immigrants | Oceania | 68.4 /100 | #163 | Good 16.1% |
| Immigrants | Colombia | 67.8 /100 | #164 | Good 16.1% |
| Immigrants | Germany | 67.3 /100 | #165 | Good 16.1% |
| South Americans | 67.2 /100 | #166 | Good 16.1% |
| Uruguayans | 64.7 /100 | #167 | Good 16.2% |
| Yugoslavians | 64.4 /100 | #168 | Good 16.2% |
| Costa Ricans | 64.2 /100 | #169 | Good 16.2% |
| Immigrants | Venezuela | 64.2 /100 | #170 | Good 16.2% |
| Immigrants | Saudi Arabia | 64.0 /100 | #171 | Good 16.2% |
| Afghans | 62.3 /100 | #172 | Good 16.2% |