U.S. Virgin Islander vs Arapaho Female Poverty
COMPARE
U.S. Virgin Islander
Arapaho
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
U.S. Virgin Islanders
Arapaho
17.3%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
315th/ 347
METRIC RANK
17.5%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
321st/ 347
METRIC RANK
U.S. Virgin Islander vs Arapaho Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 87,511,950 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of U.S. Virgin Islanders and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.221 and weighted average of 17.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 29,777,916 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Arapaho and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.044 and weighted average of 17.5%, a difference of 0.98%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | U.S. Virgin Islander | Arapaho |
Minimum | 0.93% | 9.4% |
Maximum | 45.9% | 58.3% |
Range | 45.0% | 48.9% |
Mean | 16.9% | 24.5% |
Median | 16.8% | 22.0% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 12.5% | 16.5% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 19.1% | 27.7% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.6% | 11.2% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 7.7% | 12.2% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 7.6% | 12.0% |
Demographics Similar to U.S. Virgin Islanders and Arapaho by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to U.S. Virgin Islanders are Honduran (17.4%, a difference of 0.30%), Immigrants from Congo (17.4%, a difference of 0.49%), Ute (17.5%, a difference of 0.82%), Cajun (17.5%, a difference of 0.83%), and Immigrants from Dominica (17.5%, a difference of 0.91%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Arapaho are Immigrants from Dominica (17.5%, a difference of 0.060%), Cajun (17.5%, a difference of 0.15%), Ute (17.5%, a difference of 0.16%), Immigrants from Congo (17.4%, a difference of 0.48%), and Menominee (17.6%, a difference of 0.65%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
Africans | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 16.9% |
Immigrants | Mexico | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 17.0% |
Creek | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 17.0% |
Immigrants | Guatemala | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 17.0% |
Immigrants | Somalia | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 17.0% |
British West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 17.0% |
Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 17.1% |
U.S. Virgin Islanders | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 17.3% |
Hondurans | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 17.4% |
Immigrants | Congo | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 17.4% |
Ute | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 17.5% |
Cajuns | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 17.5% |
Immigrants | Dominica | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 17.5% |
Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 17.5% |
Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 17.6% |
Paiute | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 17.7% |
Immigrants | Honduras | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 17.7% |
Colville | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 17.8% |
Central American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #326 | Tragic 18.0% |
Yakama | 0.0 /100 | #327 | Tragic 18.0% |
Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 18.6% |