Guatemalan vs Arapaho Family Poverty
COMPARE
Guatemalan
Arapaho
Family Poverty
Family Poverty Comparison
Guatemalans
Arapaho
11.7%
FAMILY POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
302nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
12.7%
FAMILY POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
321st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Guatemalan vs Arapaho Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 408,686,067 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Guatemalans and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.401 and weighted average of 11.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 29,764,504 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Arapaho and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.003 and weighted average of 12.7%, a difference of 8.0%.
Family Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Guatemalan | Arapaho |
Minimum | 3.3% | 5.6% |
Maximum | 51.9% | 50.0% |
Range | 48.7% | 44.4% |
Mean | 16.8% | 21.9% |
Median | 15.0% | 19.5% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 11.1% | 10.3% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 20.1% | 31.2% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 9.0% | 20.8% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 8.7% | 12.8% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 8.6% | 12.6% |
Demographics Similar to Guatemalans and Arapaho by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Guatemalans are Bahamian (11.7%, a difference of 0.040%), African (11.8%, a difference of 0.50%), Immigrants from Latin America (11.8%, a difference of 0.69%), Mexican (11.8%, a difference of 0.88%), and Cajun (11.9%, a difference of 1.4%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Arapaho are Inupiat (12.5%, a difference of 1.5%), British West Indian (12.4%, a difference of 2.0%), Immigrants from Grenada (12.4%, a difference of 2.1%), U.S. Virgin Islander (12.4%, a difference of 2.1%), and Honduran (12.4%, a difference of 2.3%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
Bahamians | 0.0 /100 | #301 | Tragic 11.7% |
Guatemalans | 0.0 /100 | #302 | Tragic 11.7% |
Africans | 0.0 /100 | #303 | Tragic 11.8% |
Immigrants | Latin America | 0.0 /100 | #304 | Tragic 11.8% |
Mexicans | 0.0 /100 | #305 | Tragic 11.8% |
Cajuns | 0.0 /100 | #306 | Tragic 11.9% |
Immigrants | Congo | 0.0 /100 | #307 | Tragic 11.9% |
Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 11.9% |
Hispanics or Latinos | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 12.0% |
Immigrants | Guatemala | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 12.0% |
Ute | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 12.1% |
Immigrants | Central America | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 12.1% |
Immigrants | Caribbean | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 12.2% |
Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 12.2% |
Immigrants | Mexico | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 12.3% |
Hondurans | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 12.4% |
Immigrants | Grenada | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 12.4% |
U.S. Virgin Islanders | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 12.4% |
British West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 12.4% |
Inupiat | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 12.5% |
Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 12.7% |