Guamanian/Chamorro vs Costa Rican Poverty
COMPARE
Guamanian/Chamorro
Costa Rican
Poverty
Poverty Comparison
Guamanians/Chamorros
Costa Ricans
12.1%
POVERTY
63.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
154th/ 347
METRIC RANK
12.2%
POVERTY
62.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
157th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Guamanian/Chamorro vs Costa Rican Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 221,867,885 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Guamanians/Chamorros and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.779 and weighted average of 12.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 253,487,550 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Costa Ricans and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.048 and weighted average of 12.2%, a difference of 0.18%.
Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Guamanian/Chamorro | Costa Rican |
Minimum | 1.7% | 2.4% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 39.8% |
Range | 98.3% | 37.4% |
Mean | 15.8% | 10.8% |
Median | 10.7% | 10.2% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 7.8% | 6.2% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 14.3% | 12.8% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.5% | 6.6% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 17.8% | 6.9% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 17.5% | 6.8% |
Demographics Similar to Guamanians/Chamorros and Costa Ricans by Poverty
In terms of poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Guamanians/Chamorros are Immigrants from Northern Africa (12.1%, a difference of 0.010%), Hungarian (12.2%, a difference of 0.020%), Scotch-Irish (12.2%, a difference of 0.14%), Taiwanese (12.2%, a difference of 0.22%), and Pennsylvania German (12.2%, a difference of 0.32%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Costa Ricans are Scotch-Irish (12.2%, a difference of 0.040%), Taiwanese (12.2%, a difference of 0.040%), Pennsylvania German (12.2%, a difference of 0.14%), Hungarian (12.2%, a difference of 0.15%), and Immigrants from Northern Africa (12.1%, a difference of 0.18%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Poverty |
Syrians | 75.1 /100 | #145 | Good 12.0% |
Afghans | 74.9 /100 | #146 | Good 12.0% |
Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 73.7 /100 | #147 | Good 12.0% |
Immigrants | Germany | 72.7 /100 | #148 | Good 12.0% |
Immigrants | Malaysia | 72.7 /100 | #149 | Good 12.0% |
Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 72.3 /100 | #150 | Good 12.0% |
Samoans | 71.9 /100 | #151 | Good 12.0% |
Armenians | 67.6 /100 | #152 | Good 12.1% |
Immigrants | Northern Africa | 63.9 /100 | #153 | Good 12.1% |
Guamanians/Chamorros | 63.9 /100 | #154 | Good 12.1% |
Hungarians | 63.6 /100 | #155 | Good 12.2% |
Scotch-Irish | 62.6 /100 | #156 | Good 12.2% |
Costa Ricans | 62.2 /100 | #157 | Good 12.2% |
Taiwanese | 61.8 /100 | #158 | Good 12.2% |
Pennsylvania Germans | 60.8 /100 | #159 | Good 12.2% |
Immigrants | Nepal | 60.4 /100 | #160 | Good 12.2% |
Immigrants | Fiji | 59.1 /100 | #161 | Average 12.2% |
Ethiopians | 59.1 /100 | #162 | Average 12.2% |
Immigrants | Ethiopia | 58.6 /100 | #163 | Average 12.2% |
Colombians | 57.8 /100 | #164 | Average 12.2% |
Immigrants | Albania | 57.7 /100 | #165 | Average 12.2% |