Samoan vs Costa Rican Poverty
COMPARE
Samoan
Costa Rican
Poverty
Poverty Comparison
Samoans
Costa Ricans
12.0%
POVERTY
71.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
151st/ 347
METRIC RANK
12.2%
POVERTY
62.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
157th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Samoan vs Costa Rican Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 225,074,148 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Samoans and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.360 and weighted average of 12.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 253,487,550 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Costa Ricans and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.048 and weighted average of 12.2%, a difference of 1.1%.
Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Samoan | Costa Rican |
| Minimum | 3.5% | 2.4% |
| Maximum | 37.9% | 39.8% |
| Range | 34.4% | 37.4% |
| Mean | 12.7% | 10.8% |
| Median | 11.4% | 10.2% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 8.6% | 6.2% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 13.6% | 12.8% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.0% | 6.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.9% | 6.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.8% | 6.8% |
Demographics Similar to Samoans and Costa Ricans by Poverty
In terms of poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Samoans are Immigrants from Kazakhstan (12.0%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Malaysia (12.0%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Germany (12.0%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina (12.0%, a difference of 0.22%), and Afghan (12.0%, a difference of 0.38%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Costa Ricans are Scotch-Irish (12.2%, a difference of 0.040%), Taiwanese (12.2%, a difference of 0.040%), Pennsylvania German (12.2%, a difference of 0.14%), Hungarian (12.2%, a difference of 0.15%), and Immigrants from Northern Africa (12.1%, a difference of 0.18%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Poverty |
| Icelanders | 77.9 /100 | #144 | Good 11.9% |
| Syrians | 75.1 /100 | #145 | Good 12.0% |
| Afghans | 74.9 /100 | #146 | Good 12.0% |
| Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 73.7 /100 | #147 | Good 12.0% |
| Immigrants | Germany | 72.7 /100 | #148 | Good 12.0% |
| Immigrants | Malaysia | 72.7 /100 | #149 | Good 12.0% |
| Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 72.3 /100 | #150 | Good 12.0% |
| Samoans | 71.9 /100 | #151 | Good 12.0% |
| Armenians | 67.6 /100 | #152 | Good 12.1% |
| Immigrants | Northern Africa | 63.9 /100 | #153 | Good 12.1% |
| Guamanians/Chamorros | 63.9 /100 | #154 | Good 12.1% |
| Hungarians | 63.6 /100 | #155 | Good 12.2% |
| Scotch-Irish | 62.6 /100 | #156 | Good 12.2% |
| Costa Ricans | 62.2 /100 | #157 | Good 12.2% |
| Taiwanese | 61.8 /100 | #158 | Good 12.2% |
| Pennsylvania Germans | 60.8 /100 | #159 | Good 12.2% |
| Immigrants | Nepal | 60.4 /100 | #160 | Good 12.2% |
| Immigrants | Fiji | 59.1 /100 | #161 | Average 12.2% |
| Ethiopians | 59.1 /100 | #162 | Average 12.2% |
| Immigrants | Ethiopia | 58.6 /100 | #163 | Average 12.2% |
| Colombians | 57.8 /100 | #164 | Average 12.2% |