Filipino vs Welsh Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
COMPARE
Filipino
Welsh
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Comparison
Filipinos
Welsh
11.4%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
3rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
15.6%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
85.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
145th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Filipino vs Welsh Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 250,600,431 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Filipinos and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.075 and weighted average of 11.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 511,157,850 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Welsh and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.717 and weighted average of 15.6%, a difference of 36.9%.

Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Filipino | Welsh |
Minimum | 0.99% | 9.5% |
Maximum | 31.6% | 100.0% |
Range | 30.7% | 90.5% |
Mean | 8.9% | 35.5% |
Median | 8.3% | 19.9% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.2% | 17.0% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 11.4% | 56.9% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.3% | 39.8% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.7% | 29.1% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.7% | 28.8% |
Similar Demographics by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Demographics Similar to Filipinos by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Filipinos are Tsimshian (11.5%, a difference of 0.52%), Immigrants from Taiwan (11.3%, a difference of 0.87%), Immigrants from India (11.0%, a difference of 3.5%), Thai (11.8%, a difference of 3.6%), and Immigrants from Hong Kong (12.3%, a difference of 8.0%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
Immigrants | India | 100.0 /100 | #1 | Exceptional 11.0% |
Immigrants | Taiwan | 100.0 /100 | #2 | Exceptional 11.3% |
Filipinos | 100.0 /100 | #3 | Exceptional 11.4% |
Tsimshian | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 11.5% |
Thais | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 11.8% |
Immigrants | Hong Kong | 100.0 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 12.3% |
Chinese | 100.0 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 12.3% |
Iranians | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 12.4% |
Immigrants | Singapore | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 12.5% |
Immigrants | Iran | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 12.6% |
Immigrants | South Central Asia | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 12.7% |
Bhutanese | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 12.7% |
Immigrants | Ireland | 99.9 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 12.9% |
Burmese | 99.9 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 13.0% |
Okinawans | 99.9 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 13.0% |
Demographics Similar to Welsh by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Welsh are Israeli (15.6%, a difference of 0.20%), Immigrants from Peru (15.6%, a difference of 0.29%), Samoan (15.7%, a difference of 0.29%), Canadian (15.6%, a difference of 0.44%), and Immigrants from Jordan (15.6%, a difference of 0.46%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
Immigrants | Vietnam | 88.2 /100 | #138 | Excellent 15.5% |
Armenians | 87.9 /100 | #139 | Excellent 15.5% |
New Zealanders | 87.2 /100 | #140 | Excellent 15.6% |
Immigrants | Jordan | 87.2 /100 | #141 | Excellent 15.6% |
Canadians | 87.1 /100 | #142 | Excellent 15.6% |
Immigrants | Peru | 86.6 /100 | #143 | Excellent 15.6% |
Israelis | 86.3 /100 | #144 | Excellent 15.6% |
Welsh | 85.4 /100 | #145 | Excellent 15.6% |
Samoans | 84.2 /100 | #146 | Excellent 15.7% |
Slavs | 83.1 /100 | #147 | Excellent 15.7% |
Icelanders | 82.4 /100 | #148 | Excellent 15.7% |
Immigrants | Hungary | 80.9 /100 | #149 | Excellent 15.8% |
Immigrants | Albania | 80.7 /100 | #150 | Excellent 15.8% |
Venezuelans | 80.1 /100 | #151 | Excellent 15.8% |
Immigrants | Kuwait | 79.4 /100 | #152 | Good 15.8% |