Filipino vs Slovak Married-Couple Family Poverty
COMPARE
Filipino
Slovak
Married-Couple Family Poverty
Married-Couple Family Poverty Comparison
Filipinos
Slovaks
4.0%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
17th/ 347
METRIC RANK
4.0%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
14th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Filipino vs Slovak Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 252,645,683 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Filipinos and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.159 and weighted average of 4.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 392,761,717 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Slovaks and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.588 and weighted average of 4.0%, a difference of 0.33%.
Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Filipino | Slovak |
| Minimum | 0.49% | 1.6% |
| Maximum | 7.5% | 28.9% |
| Range | 7.0% | 27.4% |
| Mean | 3.7% | 5.4% |
| Median | 3.3% | 4.1% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.8% | 3.2% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 4.4% | 5.6% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.6% | 2.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.4% | 4.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.4% | 4.5% |
Demographics Similar to Filipinos and Slovaks by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Filipinos are Italian (4.0%, a difference of 0.010%), German (4.0%, a difference of 0.030%), Polish (4.0%, a difference of 0.30%), Czech (4.0%, a difference of 0.37%), and Immigrants from Ireland (4.1%, a difference of 0.79%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Slovaks are Polish (4.0%, a difference of 0.030%), Czech (4.0%, a difference of 0.040%), German (4.0%, a difference of 0.30%), Italian (4.0%, a difference of 0.34%), and Bulgarian (4.0%, a difference of 0.92%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
| Swedes | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 3.9% |
| Luxembourgers | 100.0 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 3.9% |
| Latvians | 100.0 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 3.9% |
| Thais | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 3.9% |
| Croatians | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 3.9% |
| Carpatho Rusyns | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 3.9% |
| Lithuanians | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 4.0% |
| Bulgarians | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 4.0% |
| Czechs | 100.0 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 4.0% |
| Slovaks | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 4.0% |
| Poles | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 4.0% |
| Germans | 100.0 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 4.0% |
| Filipinos | 100.0 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 4.0% |
| Italians | 100.0 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 4.0% |
| Immigrants | Ireland | 99.9 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 4.1% |
| Maltese | 99.9 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 4.1% |
| Zimbabweans | 99.9 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 4.1% |
| Immigrants | Singapore | 99.9 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 4.1% |
| Bhutanese | 99.9 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 4.1% |
| Eastern Europeans | 99.9 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 4.1% |
| Immigrants | Taiwan | 99.9 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 4.1% |