Immigrants from Latin America vs Inupiat Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Latin America
Inupiat
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Latin America
Inupiat
23.7%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
280th/ 347
METRIC RANK
23.1%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
0.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
270th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Latin America vs Inupiat Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 541,789,164 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Latin America and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.074 and weighted average of 23.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 95,986,972 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Inupiat and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.161 and weighted average of 23.1%, a difference of 2.5%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Latin America | Inupiat |
| Minimum | 8.5% | 8.3% |
| Maximum | 68.5% | 73.6% |
| Range | 60.0% | 65.3% |
| Mean | 23.7% | 30.3% |
| Median | 23.4% | 24.4% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 21.3% | 17.1% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 26.5% | 40.1% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.2% | 23.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.4% | 18.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.4% | 18.4% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Latin America and Inupiat by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Latin America are Alaskan Athabascan (23.6%, a difference of 0.49%), Immigrants from Zaire (23.8%, a difference of 0.51%), Nonimmigrants (23.6%, a difference of 0.53%), Guatemalan (23.8%, a difference of 0.56%), and Pennsylvania German (23.6%, a difference of 0.60%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Inupiat are Subsaharan African (23.2%, a difference of 0.25%), Hmong (23.1%, a difference of 0.26%), Fijian (23.1%, a difference of 0.28%), Senegalese (23.0%, a difference of 0.35%), and Immigrants from Micronesia (23.0%, a difference of 0.41%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Central Americans | 0.2 /100 | #265 | Tragic 23.0% |
| Immigrants | Micronesia | 0.2 /100 | #266 | Tragic 23.0% |
| Senegalese | 0.2 /100 | #267 | Tragic 23.0% |
| Fijians | 0.2 /100 | #268 | Tragic 23.1% |
| Hmong | 0.2 /100 | #269 | Tragic 23.1% |
| Inupiat | 0.2 /100 | #270 | Tragic 23.1% |
| Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.1 /100 | #271 | Tragic 23.2% |
| Immigrants | Senegal | 0.1 /100 | #272 | Tragic 23.2% |
| Alaska Natives | 0.1 /100 | #273 | Tragic 23.3% |
| Marshallese | 0.1 /100 | #274 | Tragic 23.3% |
| Mexican American Indians | 0.1 /100 | #275 | Tragic 23.4% |
| Immigrants | Azores | 0.0 /100 | #276 | Tragic 23.5% |
| Pennsylvania Germans | 0.0 /100 | #277 | Tragic 23.6% |
| Immigrants | Nonimmigrants | 0.0 /100 | #278 | Tragic 23.6% |
| Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #279 | Tragic 23.6% |
| Immigrants | Latin America | 0.0 /100 | #280 | Tragic 23.7% |
| Immigrants | Zaire | 0.0 /100 | #281 | Tragic 23.8% |
| Guatemalans | 0.0 /100 | #282 | Tragic 23.8% |
| German Russians | 0.0 /100 | #283 | Tragic 23.9% |
| Immigrants | Dominica | 0.0 /100 | #284 | Tragic 23.9% |
| Immigrants | Guatemala | 0.0 /100 | #285 | Tragic 24.1% |