Czech vs Chilean Child Poverty Under the Age of 16
COMPARE
Czech
Chilean
Child Poverty Under the Age of 16
Child Poverty Under the Age of 16 Comparison
Czechs
Chileans
13.8%
CHILD POVERTY UNDER THE AGE OF 16
99.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
45th/ 347
METRIC RANK
14.8%
CHILD POVERTY UNDER THE AGE OF 16
94.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
107th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Czech vs Chilean Child Poverty Under the Age of 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 477,035,895 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Czechs and poverty level among children under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.035 and weighted average of 13.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 255,499,348 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Chileans and poverty level among children under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.115 and weighted average of 14.8%, a difference of 7.5%.

Child Poverty Under the Age of 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Czech | Chilean |
Minimum | 0.42% | 2.6% |
Maximum | 59.4% | 57.2% |
Range | 59.0% | 54.6% |
Mean | 13.9% | 15.3% |
Median | 12.8% | 13.1% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 10.1% | 9.6% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 16.7% | 16.8% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.7% | 7.2% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 7.6% | 11.6% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 7.6% | 11.5% |
Similar Demographics by Child Poverty Under the Age of 16
Demographics Similar to Czechs by Child Poverty Under the Age of 16
In terms of child poverty under the age of 16, the demographic groups most similar to Czechs are Greek (13.8%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Moldova (13.8%, a difference of 0.22%), Immigrants from Sri Lanka (13.8%, a difference of 0.29%), Immigrants from Asia (13.8%, a difference of 0.29%), and Croatian (13.8%, a difference of 0.37%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Under the Age of 16 |
Luxembourgers | 99.5 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 13.6% |
Immigrants | Australia | 99.5 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 13.6% |
Immigrants | Scotland | 99.4 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 13.7% |
Croatians | 99.4 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 13.8% |
Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 99.3 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 13.8% |
Immigrants | Moldova | 99.3 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 13.8% |
Greeks | 99.3 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 13.8% |
Czechs | 99.3 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 13.8% |
Immigrants | Asia | 99.2 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 13.8% |
Estonians | 99.2 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 13.9% |
Koreans | 99.2 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 13.9% |
Italians | 99.2 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 13.9% |
Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 99.1 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 13.9% |
Immigrants | Greece | 99.1 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 13.9% |
Poles | 98.9 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 14.0% |
Demographics Similar to Chileans by Child Poverty Under the Age of 16
In terms of child poverty under the age of 16, the demographic groups most similar to Chileans are Serbian (14.8%, a difference of 0.060%), Jordanian (14.8%, a difference of 0.090%), Tlingit-Haida (14.9%, a difference of 0.16%), Basque (14.8%, a difference of 0.19%), and Immigrants from England (14.8%, a difference of 0.30%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Under the Age of 16 |
Dutch | 95.1 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 14.8% |
Immigrants | Switzerland | 95.1 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 14.8% |
Romanians | 95.0 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 14.8% |
Immigrants | Egypt | 94.9 /100 | #103 | Exceptional 14.8% |
Immigrants | England | 94.8 /100 | #104 | Exceptional 14.8% |
Basques | 94.7 /100 | #105 | Exceptional 14.8% |
Serbians | 94.5 /100 | #106 | Exceptional 14.8% |
Chileans | 94.4 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 14.8% |
Jordanians | 94.2 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 14.8% |
Tlingit-Haida | 94.1 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 14.9% |
English | 93.5 /100 | #110 | Exceptional 14.9% |
Immigrants | Denmark | 93.5 /100 | #111 | Exceptional 14.9% |
Irish | 93.4 /100 | #112 | Exceptional 14.9% |
Belgians | 93.3 /100 | #113 | Exceptional 14.9% |
Sri Lankans | 93.2 /100 | #114 | Exceptional 14.9% |